Robert Reich's Blog

Robert Reich was the nation's 22nd Secretary of Labor and is a professor at the University of California at Berkeley. His latest book is "Supercapitalism." This is his personal journal.

My Photo
Name: Robert Reich

Latest book, "Supercapitalism," is now out in paperback. For copies of articles, books, and public radio commentaries, go to www.robertreich.org. This blog is available as an RSS feed. Public radio commentaries are now available as a podcast.

Sunday, April 13, 2008

Obama, Bitterness, Meet the Press, and the Old Politics

I was born in Scranton, Pennsylvania, 61 years ago. My father sold $1.98 cotton blouses to blue-collar women and women whose husbands worked in factories. Years later, I was secretary of labor of the United States, and I tried the best I could – which wasn’t nearly good enough – to help reverse one of the most troublesome trends America has faced: The stagnation of middle-class wages and the expansion of povety. Male hourly wages began to drop in the early 1970s, adjusted for inflation. The average man in his 30s is earning less than his father did thirty years ago. Yet America is far richer. Where did the money go? To the top.

Are Americans who have been left behind frustrated? Of course. And their frustrations, their anger and, yes, sometimes their bitterness, have been used since then -- by demagogues, by nationalists and xenophobes, by radical conservatives, by political nuts and fanatical fruitcakes – to blame immigrants and foreign traders, to blame blacks and the poor, to blame "liberal elites," to blame anyone and anything.

Rather than counter all this, the American media have wallowed in it. Some, like Fox News and talk radio, have given the haters and blamers their very own megaphones. The rest have merely "reported on" it. Instead of focusing on how to get Americans good jobs again; instead of admitting too many of our schools are failing and our kids are falling behind their contemporaries in Europe, Japan, and even China; instead of showing why we need a more progressive tax system to finance better schools and access to health care, and green technologies that might create new manufacturing jobs, our national discussion has been mired in the old politics.

Listen to this morning’s “Meet the Press” if you want an example. Tim Russert, one of the smartest guys on television, interviewed four political consultants – Carville and Matalin, Bob Schrum, and Michael Murphy. Political consultants are paid huge sums to help politicians spin words and avoid real talk. They’re part of the problem. And what do Russert and these four consultants talk about? The potential damage to Barack Obama from saying that lots of people in Pennsylvania are bitter that the economy has left them behind; about HRC’s spin on Obama’s words (he’s an “elitist,” she said); and John McCain’s similarly puerile attack.

Does Russert really believe he’s doing the nation a service for this parade of spin doctors talking about potential spins and the spin-offs from the words Obama used to state what everyone knows is true? Or is Russert merely in the business of selling TV airtime for a network that doesn’t give a hoot about its supposed commitment to the public interest but wants to up its ratings by pandering to the nation’s ongoing desire for gladiator entertainment instead of real talk about real problems.

We’re heading into the worst economic crisis in a half century or more. Many of the Americans who have been getting nowhere for decades are in even deeper trouble. Large numbers of people in Pennsylvania and across the nation are losing their homes and losing their jobs, and the situation is likely to grow worse. Consumers are at the end of their ropes, fuel and food costs are skyrocketing, they can’t go deeper into debt, they can’t pay their bills. They aren’t buying, which means every business from the auto industry to housing to even giant GE is hurting. Which means they’ll begin laying off more people, and as they do, we will experience an even more dangerous downward spiral.

Bitter? You ain’t seen nothing yet. And as much as people like Russert, Carville, Matalin, Schrum, and Murphy want to divert our attention from what’s really happening; as much as HRC and McCain seek to make political hay out of choices of words that can be spun cynically by the mindless spinners of the old politics; as much as demagogues on the right and left continue to try to channel the cumulative frustrations of Americans into a politics of resentment – all these attempts will, I hope, prove futile. Eighty percent of Americans know the nation is on the wrong track. The old politics, and the old media that feeds it, are irrelevant now.

233 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Dr. Reich,
Bravo, Bravo, Bravo,
On all counts.

Just please do not equate the money with education, please...

ON all other things here... Magnificent, spoken like a true independent thinker. I noticed the SHALLOW waters threaded by FOX, especially... Hahahaha... Nothing I said says I endorse Obama, I do not know the man and like him more than anybody in the race, but I do not think I can trust him either. Just looks too much like all other politcians...

GOod Trading

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Prof. Reich,

I agree with you only so far. I could care less if "bitter" was le mot juste or not. And if they are bitter it is likely about the economy and the erosion of the middle class. But, much of the media missed the problem with Obama's statement by concentrating on the word bitter. Unfortunately, you missed the matter too.

Look past the word bitter in Obama's statement: “It's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them...". This is a condescending remark that belittles people of faith.

Faith is, by and large, a positive thing in American life. I don't know what faith if any you embrace, Dr. Reich, but I would not presume to think you arrived at it out of fear, loathing or bitterness unless you demonstrated such was the case. People seek God as a way to better their understanding of their place in the world. Faith is the refuge that allows people the strength to do what is right even when the odds are against them.

It is true that faith can be used to manipulate people and that some can be inspired out of fear to seek God. But it is just plain incorrect to generalize and say that faithful people in small towns arrive at their faith through petty motives, such as bitterness. Obama shows he looks down on people in small towns with his fallacious generalization. His statement shows his sense of self superiority. He is elitist. His statement was demeaning.

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It really is breathtaking the way the pundits focus on the inane and avoid anything meaningful.

The point to remember is that the media loves this primary battle. They want it to continue, so they keep throwing Hillary enough flotation to keep her afloat.

Of course there was barely any coverage of the video when HRC was asked about a conflict of interest with respect to Bill earning 800K from folks that support the Colombian Free trade deal.

Meet the Press did cover the serial lies about the Bosnian sniper fire, but never called them lies. Can you imagine what the punditocracy would do if Obama had lied like this?

It is too much to expect, thoughtful objective coverage of this campaign.

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Blogger D Pickard said...

Anonymous #2:

When Rove and Co. put the Gay Marriage issue on every possible ballot across the country for the '02 election, we saw what Obama was talking about recently. People did show up to vote because they were presented with an emotionally charged issue upon which to do so. It's the nature of the wedge issue. Yes, people cling to issues such as gun rights and religious issues, and they're supported in this by politicians that benefit by the focus away from more complicated issues like Economics.

Obama doesn't speak in simplistic politicspeke, and it's a risky road to take to the Whitehouse, but it's the right path to take.

I, for one, am really tired of having a few wedge issues divide up the Country while those that propagate those divisions make off with the loot.

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Blogger David J. Garcia said...

Thank you sir. I hope Carville doesn't get too pissy w/you

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Blogger Will Shetterly said...

Dr. Reich, please run for president.

Also, if anonymous trolls become a problem, you can change blogger's settings so they at least have to choose a name for themselves.

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Blogger Bud said...

Yes, these things need to be out on the table, even if they are uncomfortable. The notion that Obama, raised by a single mother, could be an elitist just boggles the mind.

He will have to learn sometimes to hold his tongue.

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Blogger Scott Ferguson said...

D pickard: Of course the religious have been manipulated by Karl Rove but you don't TELL THEM THAT! They don't want that kind of straight talk. You can not avoid coming off like your claiming that the ONLY reason they vote for guns and school prayer is because they are bitter and stupid. This was a monumental f*** up on Obama's part and I don't see how he recovers from it until the other to schmucks say something even more inane (to you, Mr McCain)

I am embarrassed that Dr Reich glossed over the second, inflammatory part of Obama's statement to dwell on the first, little disputed one.

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Anonymous Frank Thomas said...

Dr. Reich,

CNN is joining the media chorus tonight, "pandering to the nation's desire for gladiator entertainment instead of real talk about problems," at 8:00PM your time.

Could you give some deeper insights into WHY the nation desires gladiator entertainment and cannot discern how their intelligence is being made so much fun of?

Obama made a poor choice of words which he admitted to right away... in sharp contrast to Hillary's not admitting her repeated lies. Any thinking person looking into Obama's heart, his whole character, and background knows what he was trying to say.

American inability to separate Garbage from Quality never ceases to amaze me! HYPE IS LIFE! ... sadly so, even when it comes to electing a future President.

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

anonymous #2:

Your interpretation is only one of many possible interpretations.

In my opinion Mr. Obama said something very correct: that people who believe in god, when faced with dire circumstances, tend to cling to their faith and often what they perceive as patriotism, as a means of getting through bad times.

That's nothing but the truth.

Now, when you want to have these people's votes, you can do two things:

1. help them aka "the hard way"

2. scare them by telling them that the [blacks, intellectuals, atheists, gay people] want to take the last thing they have: their faith

The Republican Party always, really always, chooses option 2.

...and you're just repeating their spin.

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Anonymous Joan Garvin said...

Thank you Dr. Reich for your comments. It's always refreshing to hear what you have to say.

I believe that Senator Obama is as religious as any of the other candidates. He did not mean that people choose religion out of fear as a general rule. I'm sure that he didn't become a Christian out of fear.

HRC, McCain, Fox News, and various bloggers will take what Obama said and use it for their purposes, rather than participating in a civil conversation about the economy, American life and how we can improve it. It's unfortunate. It's a long campaign.

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thank you so much Dr. Reich for your insightful blog. Your ideas are always spot on!

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Blogger hans said...

The problem is summed up in one word - demagoguery. Looking on wikipedia I found this great quote from Mencken:

"one who will preach doctrines he knows to be untrue to men he knows to be idiots."

To what end? For a few more dollars, a nicer house, the rush of power etc etc.

It's a problem I've seen growing since the early 90's and the same time I had to stop listening to talk radio. Give me dialogue not monologue.

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Anonymous aly k said...

Dear Professor Reich,

If Russert believes that todays show is "educational" in any meaningful sense of the word, then we can comfortably conclude that the man is on crack.

And while I agree with your enthusiasm about people being politically engaged, and getting past much of the stupidity that characterizes some of the political world, and talking about the real issues... Russert is simply fulfilling his legal responsibility to his shareholders (ie. the "bottom line" is selling to audiences). Can we really be mad at HIM for that?

aly k

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dr. Reich,

You make some good points, but please do not engage class warfare. Poverty has not increased. Money does not equated better education. Most additional monies in education go administrators and unions and not the classroom.

As for political spin, if many voters do not educate themselves on the issues and candidates they have only themselves to blame.

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What do you know about the economy? You served during the bubble :) It's true I heard it on the TV.

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Anonymous susan bodnar said...

I was also born in Pennsylvania to a working class family. My grandparents were coal miners, mill workers and sometimes farmers and many of my relatives lost their lives to mine accidents and health to black lung, emphysema, and other cancers. Mining companies made lots of money off those workers and that land and when the coal was gone they moved on leaving a barren scarred earth, and some very bitter people. These workers gave everything they had to participate in an American dream that that left them far behind and without an opportunity to catch the tails of prosperity. I can go on and on about all that came next - a Vietnam war that lured young men with college educations (like my dad and uncle), alcoholism, drug abuse, and now Iraq - but lets just say that Obama was completely correct to note and talk about the bitterness and Reich is brave to stand behind his comments. If the MSM is all worked up about the anger of black Americans, just wait until working America takes the lids of their resentment. I suppose that turning Obama into an elitist is far easier than coming to terms with his acumen.

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Blogger B. Dewhirst said...

I see no reason not to be as furious at the Democratic Party's cowardice and complicity in this whole mess as I am at the Republican Party's own crimes.

2006 ought to have been the last straw.

The longer reform is postponed, the higher the bill in blood.

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Blogger PeonInChief said...

But Obama's comments were no different than most of the middle class pap we're fed through the media. That it's not true is irrelevant. One need only go to the NYT and look at the voter analysis for propositions in California. There you will find that, on all issues except gay rights (Prop. 22), the following hold:

1. Richer people are more conservative; one's commitment to anti-progressive positions increases with income. And it doesn't matter whether the issue is race (affirmative action, trying young people as adults), class (union rights) or whatever.

2. Education status has two odd blips. People with advanced degrees have the same voter distribution as high school graduates--basically 70% to the liberal end, 30% to the conservative. People who have some college are more conservative than people with B.A.s. Neither, however, is as progressive as people with advanced degrees and high school graduates.

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Blogger Will Shetterly said...

anonymous who said, "please do not engage class warfare": The US has been engaged in class warfare since Hamilton expressed his fear of the great beast.

peoninchief: the education claim makes sense, but do you have references to back that up? I'd like to repeat it, but I know I'll be questioned if I do.

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mr. Reich,
You are one of such a few voices who speak for the American Public. I appreciate your comments and concern for our nation. I wish more men like you were in our government today. May God help this nation.

KK , Dallas TX

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Let’s just recount for a moment what’s gone missing during Dubya’s benighted reign:

4 airplanes
2 towers
3000 American citizens
4000 American soldiers
2 million Iraqis
Bin Laden
Al Zawahiri
WMD
An historic Southern city
An 85 year old investment brokerage
A third of the value of a dollar
Gas at $1.47/gallon
Crude at $24.95
The homes of half a million American families
3.2 million jobs
Integrity, competence and personal accountability among our public servants
And, oh yeah, the economy of the richest nation in history.

I'd break into my anorexic piggy bank and spend good money on a bumper sticker that said:

Bitter? Hell yes we're bitter!

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Blogger dave said...

Bravos Dr Reich. Well said.

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Blogger travelingman said...

I could not have said it better myself. It is high time that we stop allowing MSM to drag the conversation down to a 30 second sound bite and start talking seriously about the issues and how we can change the world.

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Blogger thegris said...

The old media are getting more irrelevant, but they are still powerful.

Why has there been only minimal exposure of Bush's admission that he authorized the US torture programs? These are serious crimes in both US Federal law and International Law, as the US Supreme Court said, violations of Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions are known as 'war crimes'.

And yet, the MSM and Democrats in Congress yawn.

This is a tragedy for our country, we have admitted war criminals in the White House, and the MSM let's out a collective yawn.

Will the blogosphere be able to drive coverage of these crimes, instead of Obama's bowling score or some duplicitious twisting-of-words by McCain and HRC?

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Blogger Scott Ferguson said...

This post has been removed by the author.

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Blogger Scott Ferguson said...

Have any of you read Obama's original comments;

"And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

He just told small town Americans that their enthusiasm for gun ownership and their moral opposition to gays and immigration are merely because they are "bitter." Not that they actually believe that the Second Amendment guarantees them rights. Not that they believe that gay marriage is an affront to God's law. Not that they are afraid that immigrants will change the face of the towns their great-grandparents founded. I may disagree with most of their sentiments but telling them their believes are merely because they are bitter belittles them and is by definition Elitist.

All that said, I will vote for Obama in November because he is the best candidate and the only person still running who isn't dangerous.

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Blogger B. Dewhirst said...

Scott, that is a very creative interpretation of what Obama meant.

Obama's problem is he isn't radical enough by half, not that he is some nasty divider.

I want a f-cking divider.

I want Debs.

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Blogger Will Shetterly said...

Scott, I don't doubt that's what some people are hearing, but what he said is that some frustrated people turn to religion and gun rights--but note that he is very much in favor of religion and gun rights. He's not knocking either.

Ah, well. Politics is all about being extremely clear or extremely vague, and Obama wasn't quite either in this case.

But I agree with him.

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I live and work in a small town in the hinterlands of Michigan. My occupation allows me a window on the events of the day. Events from business failures to families cobbling together an existence on minimum wage and a K-Car.

We are invisible and the only thing that we produce with any regularity is young men and women for the military needs of the nation.

People here worship their God and morning coffee at the local restaurants that are still open. After the requisite bitching about the weather and the performance of the local sports teams ends, the talk turns to the economy. We don't have much of one here. There are too many "For Sale" and "For Rent" signs . Then the talk turns to politics.

I will tell you this much. Nobody here is bitter. No, they are angry. It is the seething anger that is popping the rivets of propriety. It is the anger of people who just figured out that they have been scammed. And what is different about the anger is that it is not directed at any party or candidate. There is a consensus of anger. No more talk of the election of 2000 or the so-called Clinton Prosperity years. We agree and we know that none of the candidates have the answer--just hot air.

There is no change in sight. Nosireebob. There is the promise of collapse. We may be hayseeds, but we can count.

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's another sloppy speech.

"And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

All those "or's" in there equate gun ownership and religion to anti-immigrant sentiment and xenophobia. It's not a case of "one or two of these things is not like the other." He comes across as saying that these are all traits and activities which are to be abhorred.

I don't blame some people for wondering to what extent it's a Freudian slip.

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Blogger B. Dewhirst said...

So, would I be leaping to conclusions if I assume that the reason you haven't signed your remark is because you -must- be a coward, Anonymous?

That is the only implication which ought to be drawn?

Obama is not saying these are activities which ought to be abhorred.

I am, though. Religion is poison. Gun fanatics are insane. Xenophobes ought to read their birth certificates... I'm guessing it doesn't say "Native American" on them.

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You are brilliant! Obama is all of us.

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Anonymous dinerlee said...

Dr. Reich--that said it all, and eloquently.
Someone posting missed the context of Obama's remarks. they were in response to a question about why did blue collar workers invariably vote against their own economic self-interest. It think the answer was right--nothing else is going to change for them in any of the fundamental ways that would make a difference in their lives, so they rally around one of the wedge issues that the Republicans choose each election--guns, gays (religion), abortion (religion), you get the drift, and vote for Republicans, who then spend their terms in office shoring up the wealthy and the corporate.
Dinerlee

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Obama speaks of what some don't want to hear because they have caused so much of the financial stress that has faced the working class. The media has driven up entertainment costs to the point where many middle class can't even afford cable anymore. The media has monopolized the airways, thus promoting one-sided spin. Seniors are looking forward to $4000.00 a month rent for a room in a retirement home that pays their help minimum wage. This does not include the cost of healthcare. They will have to sign over the deeds to their homes. Safeway grocery pays minimum wage to unionized workers. My friend's third grade class has more students from broken homes than children with married parents. My last employer decided that pregnant employees do not require light duty while working on the railroad, needless to say, my son was born 2 months early. Yea, I am bitter. What does my son have to look forward to? My water bill, electric bill, gas bill, property taxes, phone bill and garbage bill increase at least once if not twice a year. I haven't had a raise in 3. All of my friends who work for the state and local goverments are voting republican because they have great healthcare benefits and they don't see any problems out there. Yea, I am bitter. Chris Mathews said there was no way Obama would get elected President of the US. How many votes did Obama lose because of that statement? I'm going with my gut feelings, I'm voting for Obama and the media can take their spin for a flying leap.

A Fan in La Grande

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Blogger misteraxe said...

This whole controversy is disgusting.
There is no doubt that Obama's choice of words will continue be framed as an insult rather than what they really were. He was merely trying to characterize the overall feeling that has been imparted to him by no doubt thousands of middle americans. I am one of them, and he spoke quite eloquently with regard to the deep and heartfelt bitterness that has become such a part of our existence that we sometimes forget its there. We just remain cynical and have little hope that anyone in government cares what becomes of the folks who have kept the machinery of America online and functional since America was born. And yes, I am sure that he regrets saying something that could so easily be mischaracterized by people who know full well what he meant, but are so cynical themselves that they take the cheap shot, characterize it as an insult, and gleefully gloat on what easy pickins that the American people seem to be. Where is the press who also know full well that it wasnt an insult? They would rather use it to tittilate their audience, than to point out the obvious...that he was voicing an understanding of the very people he is championing in his run for the presidency. They ARE bitter! It isnt an insult, its a fact, and those who speak the loudest in protest are likely the most bitter of all. He isnt, nor should he be "sorry". Why do the majority of the main stream press play into this crap when they know better, it is very telling about just how "informative" our current news organizations really are. I can only count on Keith Olberman to take the high ground when it comes to truth, the rest are cheap tabloid journalists who should be ashamed. And fox...they seem to be another species.

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Blogger David Manuel said...

Why are we letting pundits and Russerts patronize us? When a thoughtful citizen states a truth they label him/her an elitist. When the right drenches us with falsehoods disguised as facts they don't bother to make mention on their shows. We are in the mess that we are in because concerted effort to dumb our thinking. We have been reduced to being treated as first graders. We re elected a criminal that stoled the Presidency. We have not used the power to impeach this administration for fear that voters will be distracted from the election. We are allowing a bunch of gangsters to declare war on Iran before this year is over. And we are concerned with choice of words to describe a reality.

We are idiots and deserve the ridicule that we bring on ourselves by other countries. Frankly, on second thought we should another eight years of McCain/Bush politics so that this system collapses and we can re build a true government of the people for the people by the people.

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

We should give the people what they deserve. 90% should live in caves and 10% in palaces. That's how the majority voted for the past 30 years.

I say screw em. Maybe Jesus will bail them out.

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Anonymous AtomicWarBaby said...

Besides "Countdown" w/ Keith Olbermann, I find Dan Abram's show, in it's new format, on MSNBC is giving more fair coverage lately. The BEST political News coverage, ironically, can be found on the DAILY SHOW & the COLBERT REPORT, on Comedy Central!

It's a pretty sad state of affairs, when the only people with the guts to speak truthfully, can only be found on COMEDY T.V. shows!

A quick nod of mostly praise also to: DAVID LETTERMAN & CRAIG FERGUSON, of CBS Late Nite Talk shows; & Conen O'Brien's Late Nite T.V. show on NBC.

I can't believe that we've become a Nation where just about all that is sold at Walmart says "MADE IN CHINA"-- or just says "DISTRIBUTED BY (name of company) without saying WHERE the product was made--because they don't want you to KNOW it was actually "MADE IN CHINA"!

But, I blame President BILL CLINYON for the sad state of Economic affairs, as much as the Republicans, for supporting NAFTA & "FREE TRADE", thus sending MILLIONS of American jobs to be OUTSOURCED to India, China, Thailand, Malaysia, etc. etc.

I agree with the commenter who mentioned that anger is quietly simmering at a slow boil, all across America. The Corporate News Media, as "ELITIST" as they come, Sen. John McCain, Hillary Clinton & the Democratic & Republican "Establishment" Elites sure don't want to acknowledge this Truth, because they'd have to admit they created it!

No wonder they're all piling on Barack Obama, they're trying to bury the essential TRUTHS of what he was saying, when he talked about Small Town Americans being "BITTER"!

Robert Reich's blog post was right on, but didn't he champion NAFTA & Free Trade, when he was Bill Clinton's Labor Secretary? I seem to recall that he did? If so, does he regret it now?

Sunday, 13 April, 2008  
Blogger kayxyz said...

"bitter" reminds me of Howard Dean's "yee-ahhay" with the noise-canceling microphone. The Roger Ailes-Rush Limbaugh-Swift Boat Veterans focused in on that. The clip appeared on the Internet, and the next day he was out of the race.

The Roger Ailes noise machine drove a governor with executive experience for the presidency and a medical degree, with insight into how to fix health care, out of the race. Seems like Roger Ailes, Karl Rove, college dropout, should be driven out of the race. "Bitter" seems like the same distraction.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Blogger palladio said...

Dr. Reich:

Wages rose when union membership was strong.

After a half century of public relations battles with industry in which unions were often their own worst enemy, union membership is today a fraction of what it once was.

Can unions make a comeback after decades of decline? If not, why? And if unions are no longer plausible, is there another way common people can gain some leverage against corporations?

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Blogger Chief said...

Professor Reich,
At age 67 and being retired for 5 years, I am probably the last of those that did (almost?) as well as their parents. My children, with far more education than I had, are not doing nearly as well.

We need someone who can bring us togather and help us find a workable solution. Unions?

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Dr Reich - I just recently saw you on the 4th episode of Century of the Self. As long as we have this "dog biscuit politics" where the voters are treated (and act) like consumers we are at the mercy of the corporate media.

Its not about the candidates, its about the voters. If the voters continue to act as "consumers" and want their every (conflicting) desire fulfilled, we are controlled by their pandering to whatever the research data shows the voters will react to. Their unconscious desires, fears, etc.

We (the voter populace esp the swing voters) need to stop acting like consumers and start behaving like citizens. Otherwise we loose to the big business model.

For everyone out there - Google "Century of the Self". Watch the videos and ESPECIALLY video number 4 and listen to what Dr Reich says at the end.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Blogger B. Dewhirst said...

Anonymous-the-recent,

Would that be the Democratic Big Business Model, or the Republican Big Business Model, and how do you propose to get an actual non-big-business candidate past the DLC?

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Blogger Classwarrior said...

I'm constantly surprised at the narrow, superficial analyses by the demagogues of the far right. Their focused attacks on FDR and the New Deal ignore an important political player during the Great Depression - Huey Long. In 1934 Louisiana Senator Long proposed radical measures to redistribute wealth including; limits on personal assets to between $1.5 million and $5 million, and 100% tax rates for incomes above $1 million. Blackwater is a new wrinkle in this round of the class war contest. With a corporate army available, will the 21st century version of the business plot lead to actual blood shed? Nothing would surprise me at this point. However, a warning to the right, my sense is that the vast majority of the military are now just as pissed off as the left. Tread with caution plutocrats, the day of reckoning looms.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Blogger Halli said...

And you are no different than the others...spin...spin...spin. Like Obama, you cloak your words in lofty rhetoric and shill for your candidate. "Old politics" is nothing but a hackneyed phrase created by a clever publicist. And Barack Obama is nothing more than the creation of the genius of David Axelrod, much as he created Deval Patrick. And these 'created' candidates are the real problem with the system, not the system itself.

Halli Casser-Jayne
http://www.thecjpoliticalreport.com

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The problem is that the media is owned by the largest corporations, and therefore controlled by the richest in the country. Meet the Press is GE owned. They are hurting, and their financial services devision is suffering worst. They want an owned politician, and both the Clintons and McCain are in the pocket.

And they are very afraid of Obama. The rich bought the politicians, but now, we, the people are mad enough that we just might vote in this un-owned pro-middle class guy.

Yes, the bankers are scared, and while they know they control sHillary and McKeating, they are unsure what to do about Obama. Hence, the idiotic attacks. It is sad to see Russert compromise what integrity he has left, though. I believe this leaves him with none.

Not only is Obama hope, Obama is the ONLY hope.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Dave Burgess said...

Mr. Reich, you said "We’re heading into the worst economic crisis in a half century or more", Didn't you say that in 1986, and wasn't it just as untrue then?

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thank you, Dr. Reich.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Blogger Ramin Rahimian said...

When he said cling to guns, religion...he meant gun and religious political issues. you all know it so stop trying to spin it otherwise.

Obama 08

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Gerald L. Campbell said...

Sec. Reich,

Would you do the country a small favor? Would you make a video recording of your remarks and put it on YouTube? That would help get your word out.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
OpenID phoenixwoman said...

Interestingly, the pundits and Hillary/McCain are the only ones who are het up over this -- Gallup and Rasmussen tracking polls show that this hasn't put a dent in Obama's lead over Clinton (or, in Gallup, his lead over McCain).

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Blogger Milt Shook said...

Dr. Reich,

You have always been a truth teller among BS artists of very high caliber.

I perused the "news" shows over the last few days (are there really any news shows, anymore? They're all opinion...) and found myself shaking my head and laughing at all of these out-of-touch millionaires telling America what they're supposed to think about Barack Obama's characterization. I live among these people, these people are my friends and family members. My father was a steelworker, and my best friend was a Teamster for many years; I hear what people like this think every day, and let me tell you; if these millionaires are so out of touch that they think the rank-and-file are thinking anything other than "right on!" than I'm thinking the news shows need a new breed of folks to come on and tell Russert what's really going on.

As for the absurd idea that Barack Obama could possibly be elitist, I've written a blog post on it, at http://www.pleasecutthecrap.com.

Great post, and thank you...

Milt Shook

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Blogger aimee said...

Thank you, Dr. Reich. Some commenters here insist that Senator Obama was saying that people only cling to religion and guns because they're bitter. That's not what he said. He said that people are bitter because for decades, Reagan, Bush, Clinton and Bush have ignored their economic concerns. Therefore, some people may become bitter about ECONOMICS, and vote on emotional issues like religion and gun rights.

I wish that anbody in the media were capable of getting this distinction.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous bellatrys said...

Thanks for the honesty. As someone who got poorer and poorer under your tenure while working longer and longer hours - I vividly recall listening to the impeachment hearings on NPR while driving a car with two donuts to work b/c I couldn't afford to buy new tires, and being jeered at it by my liberal environmentalist employers - and who remembers, albeit from a child's perspective, the widespread national bleakness of the '70s, I appreciate the acknowledgment of failure and need for reform.

Cold comfort for both of us, but one takes what one can get.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous SpinDR said...

Thanks so much for bringing a rational perspective to this so-called issue. It's one thing to have Politico.com get all lathered up about it, it's quite another to have trusted journalists like Mr. Russert promote this as some kind of game-changing event.

This is the down side of an Internet era where continuous connectivity seems to be driving a compulsive need to generate blog postings on a continous basis. The problem is not the blogging, but the blather that results when bloggers have nothing much to say.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Blogger abarefootboy said...

Simply a ... ' Thank You Robert Reich '. I always stop and listen or read to whatever it is on your mind. Sometimes things found along the path are just too, beautiful or rare or ... evoking of compassion ... to pass by.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Blogger The Bag of Health and Politics said...

Very, very well said. I am one of those rural Americans that the Clinton campaign is trying to pass out "I'm not bitter" buttons to. But I am bitter. The failure of Washington politicians to truly reform health care has totally shattered my life. I've become a statistic. Damn Right I'm Bitter.

Shortly after remission I was invited to this bizarre Washington dinner for a few patients, nurses, and Congresspeople/big media people. Tony Snow and Bob Schieffer were there. The message of those people was so out of touch with the message of my experiences and of the experiences of the countless fellow patients I talked with in waiting rooms across Baltimore.

The Washington set thought that once someone beat back a disease, that their problems were over and the sky was the limit. They didn't think about having to file endless appeals with insurance companies because of improper denials. They didn't think about the staggering copays which bankrupt many patients. They didn't think about the fact that a job might not be there for a person after a long illness. And they didn't think about the fact that employers don't like to hire people with resume gaps because it's a health red flag. Their system is different. Tony Snow or Bob Schieffer would both have a job if they had to take a year or two off for medical reasons (they both have the same condition--Crohn's Disease/Ulcerative Colitis) as I do. Didn't work out that way for me. Of course, I'm bitter. And I absolutely have a right to be.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Deacon Blues said...

Dr. Reich,

You move among these people (Russert, et. al.). Do they have even the least bit of embarrassment about what they're doing? Or do they just not care?

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Blogger anjiaoshi said...

Dave Burgess, it was absolutely true then. That's because this is the very same crisis, still undermining our economy 22 years later. It never went away; it just got bad enough that even the media finally noticed something was wrong.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Blogger Jon said...

Dr. Reich,

This blog post nails it!

Please, if you ever are asked to enter public service at the highest levels again, consider it!

We need more intelligent and tuned-in people like yourself!

Regards,
--Jon

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Blogger Art A Layman said...

Dr. Reich:

Another nice post but not exactly epiphanic.

It is not news that politicians become semantic/rhetoric experts during election periods (which seem neverending).

It is not news that the media focuses on that which stirs viewer's entertainment interests versus their intellectual aspects.

We are, again, in the heat of a primary campaign where there are no major differences between the Democratic candidates. In that scenario; call it unfair, peevish, damaging to the party, nitpicking or whatever miniscule adjective you choose to employ, it is politics, plain and simple. It ain't pretty but it can be effective.

Were your post to be an objective social/political analysis rather than an Obama campaign speech, you might have mentioned the Hillary incident from last week.

After relating a story told to her about the mother and child who died in the hospital, the hospital issued a cease and desist proclamation claiming the story was untrue. The media, especially the 24/7 cable genre, hour after hour repeated the clip of Hillary's statement followed by noting the hospital's disclaimer. They paraded consulant after consultant, pundit after pundit, asking each, what was she thinking and how will this affect her. Their answers clearly exposed that the consultants/pundits really had no idea what the facts were. Most replied with, "Well it goes to her trustworthiness", end of query.

Now the next day when the Washington Post reported that the Hillary story was essentially fact, we saw a very limited response from those same media. Admittedly, General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker in their Senate hearings were providing the entertainment for the day, so there was little time to repeat and repeat that yesterday's news story was tainted. The point being that the correction received almost no airtime at all.

As a social/political commentator casting critiques on the media, perhaps your focus should be less concentrated.

Most likely we can trace the change of media news?, at least for TV, to the conversion of it from a public service function to a profit center. As a profit center it must produce revenues and for a news program to effect revenues it must dwell more on the entertainment aspect than the pure informational aspect. On a positive note, the heightened coverage has many more people paying attention than was historically the case.

There have been a few entries here alluding to Rove as the author of dirty, inane politics. Actually, dirty politics has been with us for throughout our history. Today's version, with an emphasis on fatuous sound bites and splitting hairs can probably best be laid at the feet of Lee Atwater. Rove merely improved on the model.

The public, voting or not, is as responsible for the political tone as any one person or the media. They have absorbed and responded to the vitriolic nature of what we refer to as debate, be it direct or through advertising or through media programming. Listen to the many callers to Rush, etc., and hear the regurgitation of the message they are receiving. That alone is enough to make one bitter.

We are a nation enrapt with competition. We love the game, be it sport or debate or politics. We relish the "fouls" and then the successful free throws. We seem to live vicariously through the competitive efforts of others. As much as we rail indignant and plead for a better way, we respond to the status quo. Until that changes nothing else will change.

I, personally, don't disagree with Obama's statement. I do believe that for many the emotion has shifted from frustration to bitterness over the direction our beloved country has been traversing. Religion is clearly the venue that many seek out when they are frustrated or confused by the actions of our leaders or our economy. This is not demeaning nor is it cowardice. It is merely seeking answers or comfort from that which those inclined rely on for solace.

Guns can fill that void as well. Guns, for target practice or hunting, restore, in some people, a sense of power, of control. Unfortunately, some carry that need for power and control to using guns to harm other people as an expression of extreme frustration or bitterness or despair. For those less inclined to using a final determinate such as guns, blaming others becomes, if not the answer, at least the resolver of who or what is causing their angst.

I keep remembering memorable lines from, The American President, a movie that every politician should be forced to watch every morning: "And whatever your particular problem is, I promise you, Bob Rumson is not the least bit interested in solving it. He is interested in two things and two things only: making you afraid of it and telling you who's to blame for it. That, ladies and gentlemen, is how you win elections."

One cannot easily discern the complicated thoughts that emote through language. Those who use language well can be awesome. They can also be foolish if they underestimate the nuances of language. The art of politics requires thinking as an elite - we don't want another "common man" as President, we're just finishing with that experiment - and yet communicating as "everyman". It can be very thin ice. Obama generally does it well but missteps are the stuff that opponent's dreams are made of.

As of late, Dr. Reich, only ventures into analysis of our political processes when defending or promoting his favored candidate. Perfectly within his rights. One would only suggest that a disclosure of some kind might be in order since many of his readers consider his comments as objective analysis with no particular bent.

I am not an Obama supporter at this point. I lean toward Hillary but will support Obama if he prevails. My biggest concern is his, to me, naivete. His seeming belief that he alone can change the tone of political debate in DC. If I am correct in my view of his inexperience, this could lead him to be manipulated by more experienced political advisors and staff. Not altogether a bad thing but with so many things needing fixing, he will likely need 8 years to be effective. Depending on his successes in the first couple of years, the 2012 campaigning might have to start early, draining time and energy. It is imperative that he hit the ground running if he wins. Inexperience and naivete could be a barrier.

Let us not get all bent out of shape with the vagaries of the game. It can be disgusting and disheartening. As with all contests, we want our favorite to win but the true enthusiast also appreciates the flow of the game. The feedback would imply that many of the public agree with Hillary's and McCain's view of the remarks. That is why careful communicating is important.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

A small anecdote about this:

My wife comes from a small coal town in southern Appalachia, where the hot job prospects at present are openings for guards at a recently built federal prison.

For the last few months, she's been leaning toward Clinton, while I've been in the Obama camp. Friday night I found the Washington Post article and read aloud to her what Obama said in San Francisco, and also Clinton's response about how small towners are not bitter, but "resilient" and "optimistic" etc. etc.

My wife's immediate reaction was: OK, I see what you mean now, Obama *is* better.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Beautifully written. This should be on every op-ed page in America. And it should be (in spoken form) on every talk show in America, too.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
OpenID t4toby said...

Well said, Mr. Reich.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Blogger Oregon Uncle said...

Dear Dr. Reich,

To thank you for this honest assessment I will buy and read Supercapitalism.

I have been meaning to check it out since I saw you on Bill Maher framing our current economic situation as socialized capitalism, where profits are privatized and costs are socialized.

Thanks,

Bitter, but getting more hopeful in Oregon.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Blogger N8Ma said...

Would it help if we had a more prominent public broadcaster that treated the news as a common good, rather than a product that we consume? This is the business model for everything from network news to 24-hour cable...we have information, but to get it you have to sit through these car and drug ads.

PBS has Charlie Rose and Jim Lehrer. Perhaps we should consider a stronger, more robust public broadcaster to provide us with more thoughtful, "slow" news (ie not 30 sec sound bytes).

I mean, you've got the BBC, or NHK in Japan, or RTHK in Hong Kong...I've been to all three places and watched their nightly news programs. It seemed so much more mature than what we have here in the USA.

Here, we have to rely on Comedy Central to provide the public with access to both prominent politicians and important intellectuals (in between the ads for cheetos and hanes)...

Finally, I know Obama didn't mean to demean anyone who stands for 2nd amendment or abortion rights. He was responding to a specific question ("why do some in the middle and lower classes vote against their economic self interest?") His answer was spot on! I grew up in a small town in Utah, and when Bill Clinton was discussing an increase in the minimum wage, all my coworkers in the restaurant where I washed dishes were opposed to it because Rush Limbaugh said it was a bad idea--and ALL OF THEM LIVED OFF MINIMUM WAGE!!! Clinton was trying to give them more money and they told him to shove it. (These co-workers weren't Mormon, BTW, but rather the beer and shot huntin' crowd Hilary is currently courting in PA)...

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well said, Dr. Reich, as always.

One point that hasn't been made - the people in the audience, who Obama had just "insulted", gave a STANDING OVATION to his remarks. As he said in his response - "... and they say I'm out of touch??"

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Very much right on topic. As others pointed out, why does the media latch on to it? Does Tim Russert lower himself to the standards of the Jerry Springer show (Springer himself is a reasonable man but somehow decided to make a living doing the unspeakable).

At times I wonder - How does one concoct a meaningful speech without constructing a sentence which, taken out of context, leaves one open to some of the most vicious attacks. Hats off to Obama for so far having mostly escaped these cheap shots.

Sure, Hillary got hers for misrepresenting a significant event repeatedly, then warmed up by her husband, but it does not seem to quite compare to a mere phrase uttered at a lone fundraiser.

What does this say about America? Is it really made up of a nation of myopic, gun-toting bigots that hate nothing more than to be called on it?

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anytime I have heard you being interviewed, you always seem to me to be speaking truthfully and intelligently, too bad that these are not popular attributes for the typical TV commentator. The main stream media has been progressing towards "tabloid" style news coverage over the last couple of decades. I am afraid that not enough of us are making it clear to network advertisers that this is unacceptable.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thank You Dr. Reich. I haven't been paying much attention to the race since Obama won Texas, but this "bitter" stuff got me interested. For the life of me I can't figure out what all the fuss is about. Obama is just telling it like it is. I guess the good news is that they can't find anything worse to attack him with then this!

Anyway. Regarding being bitter. Not only am I bitter, but "I'M MAD AS HELL! AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE!"

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Hilltop Al said...

I'm another product of a Pennsylvania working class (yes, coal mining) family who can attest that Hillary underestimates the intelligence of PA voters when she thinks she can paint Obama as an elitist. Most Pennsylvanians see the kernel of truth in Obama's much hyped comment, and they know Hillary is twice the elitist Obama ever could hope to be. At least Obama's not afraid to speak the truth.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Blogger mike volpe said...

Dr. Reich, there is just one little problem with your interpretation. All of the ills of American society came right after a government program that was supposed to solve them known as the Great Society. Your indictment of America is also an indictment of the very liberal policies that you espouse.

Furthermore, you basically want the media to act as nothing more than a mouthpiece for liberal philosophy. You have to be kidding me here. The media should focus on why progressive taxation is better. Why is it better? The reality is that you are a naked partisan and in your world, the media should be nothing more than a moutpiece for your ideals.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Dr. Reich,

thanks.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Clint McMillen said...

I just love this blog entry. You're the first person to note something that I've been thinking for months: that the "old policits" and the "old media" are squandering a moment of truth in America's history and this campaign.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks for posting this. It says a lot of what I've been thinking.

Given what you wrote, I'm surprised by how some people, even here, still insist on reading all sorts of things into an off-the-cuff statement at what was supposed to be a private event.

Some very smart people who claim to be impartial media professionals are intentionally twisting Obama's words so as to mislead people. They have flipped his statement backwards "If you are already religious then hard times are likely to make you moreso" is not the same thing as "Only bitter people are religious."

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Blogger boblog said...

Bravo.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wow, this is terrific. Why can't we get more of this thoughtful commentary in our public discourse?

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous wtlloyd said...

All of you mildly embarrased by Obama's "condescension" -

Obama's point, poorly expressed, is that embittered people take their EYE off the BALL, and focus instead on issues that are not even corollary to the problems they face. The POINT of his comment is that political demagogues USE these hot button issues to DISTRACT from discussion of the real problems.

Get it?

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thank you Robert. I hope you get to do a version of this on air on NPR. Your thoughts and words here deserve access to far more ears and eyes.

And thank you for not doing what so many former Bill Clinton administration members are doing, following HRC down the rabbit hole. It is heartening to hear you point out what should be obvious to other former Clinton staffers but somehow isn't.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

War just isn't as sexy, I guess. (There *is* a war going on, isn't there?)

Seriously, can I just say how much I loathe what the media have become? All of them together aren't worth a bucket of warm spit.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous mpflinn said...

Thank you.

I guess if you are of the "ordinary folk class" like me, paying at the pump (not your limo driver) or buying milk or cereal or anything else (YOURSELF not your aides), you couldn't possibly be blamed for ignorance of the "bitter" (yes, BITTER) words that we are speaking down here in the trenches. What a joke - and that goes for the elitists on the Sunday news (?) programs who have the gall to discuss the issue.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Blogger Daniel Thomas MacInnes said...

Bravo, sir. Good job on calling out the inanity in mass media. It's as though we're living through Paddy Chayefski's vision of Network, filtered through the petty antics of high school cliques. This may sell to the cynical and the stupid, but it's a pain for the rest of us.

Thank goodness I grew up in the '80s, amid the time of the punk revolution. I learned that mainstream culture is a wasteland - "free speech for the dumb," as the punk band Discharge put it - and that all the real living was underground, just under the surface. We find ourselves in that situation now, with mass media conglomerates on the top, and the people-powered blogosphere on the bottom. This is revolutions are fermented. Where, oh where, is our Saint Cobain?

Am I bitter and depressed about America? Yes, absolutely. Not only am I pessimistic about this nation, but the future survival of humanity. It doesn't help that we're headed towards another Great Depression, thank you very much.

How bad are things? I listen to Black Sabbath records to cheer up.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Obama could have just said that Republican campaigns have won by pursuing divisive wedge-issue (god, guns, gays, abortion), base-mobilizing strategies. It's pretty much what he did say.
As for the charge of elitism, frankly this is coded racial bias. "Who does he think he is telling us what we all know is true?" Despite Bill Kristol's crocodile tears in today's NYT--where BK notes he taught at UPenn in his column's intro but such self-disclosure apparently doesn't count as elitism--, I still think the voters can see through this media dust storm, since after all the war, the economy, education, the environment, health care, the polarization of wealth, and a host of other issues still confront us.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is garbage. Your whole post is misleading. Reich may have been born in Scranton but grew up in South Salem, a wealthy suburb of New York City. When Reich ran for governor his support came almost exclusively from the upper-middle class despite his "committment" to the working class.

As for Fox, Fox is considerably more balanced than MSNBC, whose election coverage is led by Olbermann and Matthews, two partisan anti-Bush haters. For "balance" they occassionally bring in Joe Scarborough, who is now opposed to the Iraq War, John McCain, and basically the whole Republican party. No complaints from Reich on that or the fact that over 80% of the msm voted for John Kerry in the last election cycle. I am sure that reporters own preference has no effect on their coverage. Right!!! And Reich is the size of Yao Ming.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think When Obama said "cling to their faith" he meant that they take solace in it and tend to vote for issue that they see at an afront to their faith...Not that their faithful only because of bitterness or frustrations.

To me equating what was said to belittling someone's faith is straight out of Political spin play books. If you actually take the time to listen and digest what's being said you would see the truth in it.

Of course nothing should be generalized because everything doesn't pertain to everybody, but this is exactly what's happening today in a lot of small towns and big cities if you ask me.

I appreciate that he actually answers questions with thoughtfulness rather then soundbites. Unforutnately for him, the American people isn't ready for it, which will have us clinging to another 4 years of old school washington politics that leave most of us out.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Blogger civitas said...

Thank you very much, Mr. Reich. I have always respected your integrity and ability to detect Clinton B.S. It may be more difficult to detect Tim Russert B.S., but then again when he has spin-meisters on Meet the Pres s and calls it news, I wonder. Glad that you pointed out that at times Emporer Russert has no clothes. -- Arthur

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Blogger Jeff Boatright said...

From my perspective, the policies of the two Democratic candidates are very similar. However, Clinton is running a campaign that is essentially funded by corporations, "elite" PACs, and her private wealth. Obama's campaign is largely funded by small donations from private individuals.

For me, this attribute tips the scales in Obama's favor. I am not naive enough to think that Big Bidness won't dictate to Obama, but at least he isn't starting out behind the eight ball with them. OTOH, Clinton not only is beholden to the elite special interests and corporations, she and Bill practically invented the current iteration (though corporatists have been with us since Hamilton).

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Blogger Jeff Boatright said...

Geeze, Volpe, did your history classes not cover anything from 1803 to 1929??

You write as though unregulated capitalism was never tried before. It was. It failed. In more than one country.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Someday, I earnestly hope our Democratic strategists to come to terms with the notion that these elections are no longer just battles against Republicans. They are battles against the several dozen ridiculous nuts of the media world who run our democratic discourse like it was their own personal model train set. I see absolutely no strategists that seem to get that -- if Democrats manage to attack their opponents with more gusto, this time around, I still don't see them managing to fight the media folks.

And that is a shame, because truly -- the coverage of the race is rapidly threatening to discredit itself. There is biased, then there is stupid. And then there is orange juice.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The politics of scarcity has got the attention of the U.S. media -- that there is never enough to go round, and the problem is ... TAXES!

So we get rid of taxes (thanks to Prop 13), and to our amazement, now there is less for us all -- less services, less funding for police and firehouses, schools and filling potholes.

Sadly, as you notice, the politics of orange juice and "elitism" trumps discussion of our economic quagmire, hidden credit default swaps (which represent double the investment of the stock market, gamble on the risk of subprime loans, and are totally unregulated).

No wonder so many of us are bitter .

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Dr. Reich,

Well said!

Some have suggested we should not engage in class warfare. Class warfare will only occur when both sides in the "war" are engaged.

Since at least 1980 the middle class has not been engaged in the battle. Instead, the middle class has been the victim of repeated "shelling" (i.e. tax cuts, NAFTA, welfare reform) from the right. Whenever someone has the audacity to speak the truth they are decried as engaging in class warfare.

In my view, it is time for the middle class to become engaged and start fighting back!

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous CNN said...

For all of those out there, being ignorant on the "CLING" word:

If you watched the Compassion Forum on CNN you would know that Obama has commented on this... "clinging to what is good".

This is what Obama was referring to about Clinging in the Bible:

Romans 12:9: Let love be without hypocrisy. Abhor what is evil; CLING to what is good.

It's just too bad that a few out there bashing Obama just don't get it.

Obama is telling the truth, whether you like it or not. He will tell us what we need to hear, not just what we want to hear.

Reich is right, hard working Americans are bitter. This government only cares about the wealthiest Americans while hard working Americans barely get by.

And this year we can do something about it. We've had enough with the politics of old, the politics of fear.

This is our time.

VOTE OBAMA '08

====
Do you know why Hillary Clinton talks about this? Because she's trying to divert the American people from her issues:

Bill Clinton lying about Hillary lying:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=BGvcUunQPzg

The Clintons are playing both sides of the Colombia trade:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=GyuSYzCqXPQ

Hillary's pathetic attack on Barack Obama:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=BwG4BlK8w_Y
(MUST WATCH!)

This last one is about how RIDICULOUS her attack on Obama is.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Blogger HOPEFUL said...

Thanks for your post and I do think your points are spot on. Aside from the use of the word "bitter" to characterize people's feelings, Obama also said people cling to guns, religion, anti-immigrant sentiment etc. That is also true. He may have conflated two issues - positive and negative, but both are true. People cling to faith and traditions in hard times (more than in good times). People also turn to assessing and voting on single issues like immigration and abortion. On the flip side, people do vote on their right to bear arms, and on issues rooted in religious sentiment, like abortion - even if their economic situation remains unchanged. So, no matter how you look at those comments, no matter how "inartful" some think the choice of words, they were true. Republicans in particular have used the God, Gays, and Guns mantra for years to scare people into voting on these issues, rather than economics.

Yes, people are resilient and they press on in spite of the diffciulties. But it takes a discerning leader to look beneath and acknowledge their frustrations and their outrage, rather than pretending that everything is coming up roses. So, I say to McCain and Clinton - get real. Let's have some real straight talk for a change.

As for the elitist charge, while I have nothing against wealthy people, it's mighty hard for someone who is married into wealth, and another who has made $109m in 8 years to say that Obama is elitist. The person who was raised by a single mom, didn't know his father till later in life, raised by grandparents, went to school on grants and loans, was indebted in school loans till 3 years ago, worked on the streets organizing displaced people - that's the one that's elitist? Come on, McClinton! We are not dumb.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
OpenID slwbtspdng41 said...

Anonymous wrote:

"Look past the word bitter in Obama's statement: “It's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them...". This is a condescending remark that belittles people of faith."

This is as shortsighted and unfounded as Hillary Clinton, John McCain, and the pundits' exclamation that Barack Obama is elitist for stating what is true - the people of small town America are bitter.

Never has Barack Obama stated that America's economic situation or Washington politics have "driven" people to religion, as anonymous writes. Obama was simply pointing out that small-town Americans grip tighter to the things they most identify with and understand.

Unfortunately, thanks to an unrelenting and increasingly homogenized and thoughtless media, people like Anonymous have stopped thinking for themselves, or worse, forgotten how to altogether.

Beyond those simple truths - there lies more fact. Were we not all inundated with Barack Obama's "questionable" choice in his spiritual leader. Nowhere, at any time in any statement, has Barack Obama belittled people of faith. In fact, he has repeatedly expressed his desire to infuse faith and politics, if for no other reason than it appears the vast majority of politicians lack any moral compass. Obama has been outspoken on this topic - in fact it came up last night at CNN's Compassion Forum and was well-received by the audience there.

Please - don't perpetuate the mindless drivel our media spoonfeeds us every day. Think for yourself. And at the end of your thought - sign your name.

- Patrick Giese

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
OpenID slwbtspdng41 said...

"Hillary Clinton calls Barack Obama elitist? Really? Hillary Clinton was a corporate lawyer who sat on the Wal-Mart board before becoming First Lady and is now worth over $100 million. Barack Obama is the child of a single mother raised in part by his grandparents who went to school on a scholarship and was a community organizer making $12,000 a year before becoming a law professor, lawyer and state senator. Five years ago he was still paying off student loans. It's a bogus charge."

Jamal Simmons from Time.com

Elitists are usually finished paying off student loans before their 40s, right?

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Blogger DFW said...

Hi Bob,

This is my first visit to your blog (I prefer public forums in Truro), and hopefully not my last. Thanks for being the same refreshing voice you always have been. I just wish that some of your detractors from the left could hear you speak, and chat with you in person. Then they might figure out how much more insightful you are than they seem to think. You convinced me of that a decade ago.

Marc

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Blogger dweiums said...

I'd request that you run for office, but you are way too smart.
Thank you for keeping the focus where it truly belongs - on the real issues.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Blogger Robert said...

Dear Dr. Reich,

Beware of being fitted for a "judas" label.

Your analysis of the punditocracy is spot on. I think what we're really (and hopefully) watching is some sort of a futile last stand for the beltway crowd, and no one fits that label more than Russert and his guest on Sunday.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

i know i'm late coming to the party, but if you want a great read on what's going on and has gone on in areas like "Pennsyltucky", check out Joe Bageant's "Deer Hunting with Jesus". An incredible eye-opener, by turns hilarious, maddening, and incredibly sad - it shows how BOTH parties have dumped and dumped on this nation's regular folks.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Blogger thaynessr said...

Amen Robert,
Thank God for the internet! The "liberal", "mainstream", media would not have the guts nor integrity to print your article.

Please Obama, bring us change soon!

Theodore Haynes

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous sparafucilli said...

If the MSM doesn't finally get it's act together and start to focus on the substance of the message instead of the packaging of the message then their audience will disappear unless of course they find a way to outsource it. Just like BIG BUSINESS will have to find a way to outsource its customers after years of outsourcing its labor.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Amen to you sir!!!

I was a Republican, then an Indepenedent.

I am voting for Obama.

I will always hear what he is really thinking - no matter what it is...
I would vote for you too sir!

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sir,

Where were you when HRC was critizised for the Tuzla Mis speak. You are thinking that a person with no experience is going to change the very face of the nation. I would say that it is wishful thinking.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous George Arndt said...

What Obama was saying had much truth in it. This is very simular to the premise of the book "Whats the Matter With Kansas."

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Obama was, and is, 100% correct. That's the part I like about him: never mind "politically correct", never mind politico double-talk, he calls the problems as he sees them. As we all see them. And Pinocchia aka Anny Oakley swinging the gun is just sooooo high school... I do wish she'd get out of the race, maybe even out of the country if we could be that lucky. Her entertainment value wore off a long time ago. Watching her prance, panting to twist every word Obama says, I'm embarrassed to be a woman. Knowing that she stayed with a philandering husband, swallowed all that public humiliation just so she could be "crowned" shows her moral corruptness.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I hope Sen Obama has the good sense to appoint Dr. Reich to his cabinet.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This country will be a better place when we come to the day when a person from Harvard (the home of elitism) can be called elitist regardless of the color of their skin.

That semi-facetious remark out of the way, Obama could have defused the issue by giving any one of the "clarifications" stated by his supporters in this comment section. Instead, he has defended what he has said without addressing the ostensible misunderstanding. So, forgive me for continuing to take offense at his statement equating the religious faith of small town dwellers with xenophobia and antipathy towards people who aren't like themselves.

Being both a person of faith and a lifelong liberal, I am dismayed that Obama has made such a statement and not clarified it. To those of you who object to reading the statement as condescending or elitist because Obama is also a person of faith, I can only remind you that America is no stranger to people of one faith looking down upon people of a different faith (or even the same faith if the faith isn't expressed in a particular way).

To the person who is trying to interpret Obama's use of the word cling according to Romans 12:9, i.e. "CLING to what is good.", please reread what Obama said. He said "cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations." I find it difficult to think of clinging to guns, antipathy, xenophobia, or protectionism as clinging to "what is good". It just doesn't scan.

To the people who chide us that Obama really meant that people are distracted by wedge issues, I can see that if I squint and don't take his statement literally. But, I'm less inclined to do that because he said people use this list of issues to explain their frustrations. That's a bit different from being distracted and much closer to saying people are incapable of analyzing things correctly.

I have to take Obama's statement at face value until he clarifies it. Taking it any way other than face value is spinning it. I find it amusing that people spin Obama's statement and accuse others who take it at face value as the ones who are spinning.

Note, these comments I have made are to the posters, not to Dr. Reich. I merely think Dr. Reich missed the true problem with the statement. I've no reason to believe he is trying to spin things. And, as usual, I find his opinion worthy of contemplation even when I think he has missed the point. I will add my voice to the sentiment expressed by others that we need more clear and honest voices like Dr. Reich's in the public debate. I'd vote for him in a heartbeat.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Blogger Phil Lembo said...

Thank you for, once again, being a voice of reason in all this.

Thanks also for drawing out of your readers some of the best quotes I've come across on the media's mercenary role in our politics. My favorite being:

"... these elections are no longer just battles against Republicans. They are battles against the several dozen ridiculous nuts of the media world who run our democratic discourse like it was their own personal model train set."

Let's just hope that all of us out here in the real world can make ourselves heard through the last remaining ballots to be cast (I'm an independent living in NC who will be crossing over on May 6 to cast my vote for Obama in the primary.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Blogger shawn said...

I no longer look up @ America as the great center of freedom and free speech... when issues like these can replace the important issues facing Americans TODAY!!!

Whats obvious here is that Americans are obviously out of touch with the real issues that affect them, or at least the media makes it appear so, the problem is that the media is omnipresent in every interpretation of the word!

Imagine LOU DOBBS is given a prime time news spot to peddle his garbage!!!

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous S.W. Anderson said...

Dr. Reich, your post perfectly describes the situation. It exhibits the clear, well-informed, incisive and progressive thinking I want in a president. I wish you were running.

Regarding Russert, it's been clear for some time now that he's a very conservative-leaning corporate associate and on-air personality, as opposed to the kind of independent journalist we once took for granted and now badly need.

That makes Russert part of the problem, not the solution. Alas, he's got plenty of company.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous donna said...

So who is really going to take anyone's guns, marriage, or God away from them? The right literally survives on these fears, and uses them against the very people who vote for them.

Those at the top could care less about God, guns or gays, but have somehow convinced these voters they are on their side.

It is sad, very sad, that right-wing voters are really buying this crap after 20 years of decline in their incomes and lifestyles. It is not "elitist" to say they really ought to wake up and realize they've been taken.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I like the term "gladiator politics". It reminds me of the Star Trek episode where some planet apes the worst aspects of the Roman Empire. Televison becomes nothing but blood sport and the empire runs on bread & circuses. I fear that we are well onto our own Appian Way to disaster. It took Rome some time to fall apart, but I see all around me the signals of our own decline. It's a bitch trying to be a world power. Maybe, we should get our own house in order before we impose our Pax Americanus onto others. Karl Rove didn't dirty our political system. He just took advantage of the zeitgeist and ran with it all the way into the end zone.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is hilarious.

Now blame the media.

I mean you so pathetic. Suddenly you have a problem with the spin and what not. You have gotta be kidding me. All this while spewing hate on the Clintons and all the blather about her character was simply great for you. Now you have a problem that we are not discussing "the issues".

Where was this outrage when he sent out the 'Harry and Louise' ads? Were they not old politics? Where was this outrage when Sen. Clinton's character was being attacked? Where was this outrage where the news media spent days and days talkng solely about Sen. Obama's magical electability powers?

You are quite the fake. Just shows how much trouble Barack Obama is in.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Blogger Bruce said...

Dear Mr Reich,

My respect for you grows and grows the more I read and hear from you.

Even those of us who are doing fairly well in today's economy are bitter. We are bitter that our tax money is being spent on useless occupations. We are bitter that Wall Street executives continue to get golden parachutes while they run their companies into the ground. We are bitter that we are still the only "first world" economy that doesn't offer Universal Health Care. We are bitter that the richest of the rich continue to take a bigger share of the economic pie while the rest of us bear the burden. And I could go on...

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Blogger irlandesa said...

I cannot tell you how much I appreciate and second your words, Dr. Reich.

If nothing else these last few days, with their endless spin cycles and loops of repetitive and canned bullet points, have demonstrated the nature of the game. The pundits who can’t think for themselves, the reporters who will whore themselves out with nary a twinge, the mainstream media’s absolute dependence on this type of, yes, gladiator politics, in order to generate profit at the expense of public knowledge and basic civility.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Blogger mslindab said...

Thank you, Dr. Reich. We are tv addicts and yet no matter how much 'news' we watch we realize we are not being informed about much of anything. Today I watched David Gregory's panel talk about this and not one mentioned (or knew?) about Obama's 2004 Charlie Rose interview. Please keep providing this information. I had hoped after I saw the Moveon.org ad a few weeks ago about the media that Russert & Company would get the message. Sadly, it seems it will take more or perhaps the cause is lost!

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous Walldog said...

Thank you so much, Dr. Reich, for this fantastic blog. While I understand that Senator McCain is going to attack the presumptive Democratic nominee, it is positively shameful that Senator Clinton would so recklessly attack a fellow Democrat in her desperate attempt to somehow erase what would seem to be his inevitable nomination. And the laziness of the media, in doing nothing more than parrot the e-mails from his political rivals, is an abdication of their role as journalists.

Please continue to speak out. And, if you are so inclined, please know that I have been hoping for weeks to learn of your endorsement of Senator Obama. Our country could sure use your expertise in his administration.

Monday, 14 April, 2008  
Anonymous aly k said...

one of the many "anonymous" ppl on this site wrote that "Fox is considerably more balanced than MSNBC". AMERICA, if you really have a war on drugs, please go arrest this man (i know he's "anonymous", but im sure you won't have a problem finding him with illegal wiretapping).

Buddy, if you're going to hate on Matthews and Olbermann for being anti-bush, don't forget to bitch at.. ummmm... MOST OF THIS PLANET - who isn't too fond of the moron's policies either.

aly k

Tuesday, 15 April, 2008  
Anonymous My Melange said...

Perfectly stated! Thank you for speaking the truth.

Tuesday, 15 April, 2008  
Blogger Jeff said...

Yer right except your analysis of Russert, who is a brain dead lightweight syncophant.

Tuesday, 15 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Prof

I think most media coverage went for sound bites rather than accuracy about Obama' s comments. He was clearly talking about why this group of economically hard-hit voters have consistently voted on issues like gun control and religion rather than their economical interests. He is NOT saying people buy guns or go to church out of desparation.

The other day, I heard Christ Mattew saying his brother who lives in PA would buy more guns if he had more money, so Obama is not making sense. But Mr. Mathew is too busy talking and rather gives a pause to ask himself why the logic does not hold here.

Both humans and animals make saliency-based choices. Everybody makes choice based on one or few criteria that are deemed key issues while ignoring others that are relatively minor. That's what Obama is talking about whether one agrees with his political view or not.

Tuesday, 15 April, 2008  
Anonymous brokenarrow said...

Thank you for bringing some sanity into an otherwise grossly distorted, and insane perception of Bittergate.......sheesh.

Haven't tuned into Russert for years. It's just too pathetic, and it sickens me to even see Carvillematlin's face.

Is there anyone of these pigs-at-a-trough who deserve more than minimum wage???? The very mention of Timmy, carville, hannity, or any of the Fox talking heads churns the stomach, and causes migranes.

THEY CONTRIBUTE NOTHING TO OUR SOCIETY.

Tuesday, 15 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dr. Reich:

That was as eloquent and exacting a commentary on our most crucial problems as any I've heard. I have no dog in this hunt. I am just as aggravated at the discourse from all parties that are seeking office.

We've got real problems of enormous magnitude coming before us. We have to get past perceived slights, and platitudes to figure out a course to, essentially, save our country.

Thank you for your discussion here.

Tuesday, 15 April, 2008  
Blogger BDG123 said...

keep kicking booty. someone needs to energize this country. you have the exposure and ability to do so as do a handful of others. americans aren't as clueless as the elitists would like us to be or believe we are. we understand full well what is going on. that is why the polls are and have been so awful for such a long time. it matters not whether one is a conservative or a liberal or asian or african american, people want a more representative government. one FOR THE PEOPLE and BY THE PEOPLE. that we all agree on as witnessed by the polls. we are united against the elitist culture of dimwits that are destroying our country. and they reside in washington and on wall street. we fought a war to rid ourselves of elitists and it appears it is time for another war to do it again. this time it is a war of ideals. one similar to the one you fought in the 1960s. the king is dead.

Tuesday, 15 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The mass media in this country have become more mediocre and shallow. They are shortchanging the American public by covering trivial topics at the expense of real news and analyses. It is unfortunate that the economy, the war and the collapse of the dollar are only marginally covered.

Tuesday, 15 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I do wish people and oundits would get obama;s humble beginnings right. he had no such thing as a humble beginning father left when he was 2 mother got married two years later got her phd annie dunham he went to live with his white g/parents who are wealth g/mother vp of a bank went to an elite exclusive school on the island.
let us get real he had no hardships went to chicago to get himself immersed in politics and the church to help him get ahead.
really get it straight

Tuesday, 15 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thank you, Dr. Reich, for your succinct and thoughtful analysis.

I have two reactions. There is a subtext to Obama's remarks that most people are missing. It's not just that ordinary people are bitter and angry about their economic circumstances, and that conservative politicians, use social issues such as gun control, prayer in schools, immigration, etc., as wedge issues to convince such voters to vote against their economic interests. The real question is why does it work.

What I have observed, working as a union attorney for over 30 years, is that many smart and caring working people, while deeply frustrated about the circumstances in which they find themselves, also find it difficult to clearly identify who is responsible or how they can change it. A pervasive but subtle sense of helplessness sets in, which causes them to skeptical that any politician can or will change anything that would improve their economic conditions. So, what happens it that they shift their anger to something more tangible, such as gun control, abortion, school prayer, or the number of illegal immigrants in their community and politicians are able to take advantage of that frustration and anger.

The point is NOT that they became religious because of their anger; they already were religious and often deeply so. Nor did they start hunting because they were angry; they already did. It's part of their culture as it was of mine growing up. These were things they already cared about. The significant phenomenon is the shift in the target of their anger, because the appropriate targets of their anger are so global and overwhelming.

My second concern is political labeling. Sometimes, one word used at the right time in a campaign will stick and define the candidate from then on. The word "elitist" has layers of negative connotation and could well stick, whether deserved or not. What grates me is that Hillary is using it. I expect McCain to use the word. However, Hillary, whom I supported but whose chance of gaining the nomination is poor at best, may be helping define Obama in a way that may hand the White House to the Republicans.

Tuesday, 15 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

DR. REICH,
THIS IS WHY THE REPUBS KEEP CUTTING FUNDS FOR EDUCATION. THEY WANT EACH AND EVERY GENERATION TO BE DUMBER THAN THE LAST SO THEY CAN HAVE ALL THE POWER AND MONEY.
OBAMA HAS A TRUE HEART AND HE'S GOT MY VOTE!

Tuesday, 15 April, 2008  
Blogger james d granata said...

'Look past the word bitter in Obama's statement: “It's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them...". This is a condescending remark that belittles people of faith.'

In times of stress, despair or helplessness clinging to the familiar be it God or guns to help break the crisis cycle is condescending? Given the nightly news dishing out rape, murder, robbery and war clinging to people we have learned to trust is condescending? I think it totally appropriate and mentally healthy even.

the people who responded that Barak Obama's remarks diminished or belittled them can't have much self esteem and work very hard to feel offended.

Tuesday, 15 April, 2008  
Blogger Jacked Up said...

This is so much about the money high end media figures take in. Why would Russert even think about someone who is not making a mortgage when his world is wealth.

Tuesday, 15 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am bitter because I have fallen between the cracks in the "safety net" and nobody seems to care.

It's not just that the working people have fallen relative to the most affluent. The fact that working people are told that "polls don't matter", that it's our fault for not working hard enough (untrue), that we should blame others who didn't have a level playing field either, that if we rub our stomachs and pat our heads at the same time we can be like them (greedy and grasping).

It's insult on top of abuse.
Yes, I'm bitter. Anger has turned to frustration. Frustration has turned to bitterness as I'm told that my situation and my children don't matter as much as their profits.

It's the insult that has made me bitter.

Tuesday, 15 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thank You Sir

That was right on point. However, can you please give me your opinion, as to when does Spin end, and lying begin. Or in news speak are they same thing. Where I come from, there is no difference, call it spin average people call it lying . Why does the corportate news substitute so-called spin for analysis. We the people should start corporate media, I strongly believe when we demand a higher standard of them, all the other real issues will become illuminated.

Tuesday, 15 April, 2008  
Anonymous Vicki "Hussein" of New Mexico said...

Journalism is mighty important in a democracy. Too bad the TV news media have to compete with "American Idol" and "Survivor" to get ratings. (Oh..oh...does this comment make me an "elitist"?) The Internet is a wonderful tool for democracy because it instantly lets people know all points of view on issues and concerns. Too bad that increasing viral marketing on the internet often spreads slander and half-truths and disingenuous troll comments that frequently undermine democratic debate (Oh..oh...now I will be probably be accused of being a Marxist).
I believe we will overcome our bitterness wrought from the "Old Politics" because we have a decent, honest, intelligent candidate who understands that ultimately our power comes "of the People, by the People, and for the People". Barack Obama for President '08.

Tuesday, 15 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Let's start with some facts, for a change. Poverty in the U.S., as measured by the U.S. Census Bureau here: http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/histpov/hstpov13.html, has remained about 10% for the last three decades. It fluctuates a bit year-to-year, but is remarkably stable. So much for poverty on the increase.

If the middle class is shrinking, therefore, as Dr. Reich likes to argue, where is it going? It's not going down, according to the official U.S. Census Bureau statistics at the link above. People must, therefore, be moving up. Of the spin that the middle class is shrinking is a canard. Those are the only two choices.

If you further explore data on income from the IRS web site, you will further find that there is remarkable mobility among income class--at least as reported on tax returns. The people in poverty today have a substantial chance of elevating themselves out of poverty, as we always believed.

Tuesday, 15 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Very well said!

Tuesday, 15 April, 2008  
Blogger Russell said...

yer blahg are kool

Tuesday, 15 April, 2008  
Anonymous Klaus said...

Let’s get real here! Obama just said it the way it is and it doesn’t taste very good. The bitter pill tastes really bad! Should Obama pander to the electorate with sweet talk? NO!
Yes, the middle class and working poor turn to our faith in hope of better economic times and our traditions for some comfort.
While at the same time, the rich CEO’s and Shareholders turn to their brokers, financial planners (faith) and a day at the golf course (tradition). They are buying all those stocks (hunting) that the middle class sold at a bargain, to save the little they had left. That $109 million the Clintons earned will be a little bigger in no time…talk about elitist!
Jobs have been lost to third world or emerging market economies, and because of this, Canada has suffered the same as the US. At least Canada can say we are a fair trading partner to the US. We also have medical, minimum / fair wage standards, workers comp, pension benefits….and the list goes on. Do you see this in Central America, Indonesia, Hong Kong, China and Mexico? Look at Ontario, Canada, it’s our version of the US Midwest, with lost jobs to 3rd world countries and emerging markets (slave labor)?
You will see allot more of “Made in China” in your household vs. “Made in Canada”. Someone said that if you threw out everything that is made in China, you would free up about 75% or more of the space in your house. That’s where our jobs are going and that is a very bitter pill to swallow.
Obama hit it right on the nail!

Tuesday, 15 April, 2008  
Blogger Jai said...

Great essay. Thanks for telling it like it is. Too bad Mr. Obama has been vilified for doing the same. I agree with both of you.

Tuesday, 15 April, 2008  
Anonymous scher said...

Since we the people are up against a system run by entrenched special interests and a complicit media, the anger in this nation is getting large enough that one can only fantasize that this movement that Obama has unleashed (and not fully by design, recalling his very cautious conservative beginning) will sweep out the entire lot of that. We can only hope!We can only hope!

It reminds me of a great independent film that came out around 1980, called Northern Lights--about the origins of "grassroots". In North Dakota around 1900, the farmers were being squeezed between the railroads and the banks, with the newspapers in cahoots. A movement began, farmers talking one-on-one to other farmers. They were ignored until the farmer candidates won the primary. Then all the big guns came out to destroy the upstarts. The effort failed. The little people were elected. They called the state legislature into session, passed every one of their initiatives and adjourned after six days. It was great!

Do you think in this day and age....?

Tuesday, 15 April, 2008  
Anonymous Preston, J said...

Thank you for addressing the real issue -- Americans getting poorer and poorer by the second.

Bitter -- That word is an understatement of real feelings. People are hurting and badly.

Hillary can continue with her pretence, a republican playing democrat,no suprises there! Finally she is showing her real colours. Disappointing behavior!!

Tuesday, 15 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear America,
DO YOU STILL DOUBT, YOU ARE IN BONDAGE?

Then read this from President Woodrow Wilson. Thi guy that put you inot bondage.

--------------------------------
On Sunday, December 23, 1913, two days before Christmas, while most of Congress was on vacation, President Woodrow Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act into law.

Wilson would later express profound regret over his tragic decision, stating:

"I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world - no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men."

Wednesday, 16 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I wholeheartedy agree with your views on this, Dr. Reich. If HRC is elected president, or John McCain for that matter, I will need to take a personal day to mourn. Oh, wait, I cannot afford to do that! Hopefully Mr. Obama will be elected to the presidency; even though he has admitted his lack of knowledge regarding certain aspects of administration, he at least has the sense to find those who will work hard for the good of our country . . . instead of the good of his checkbook (GWB). I wish you were our Secretary of Labor again, Dr. Reich, and if Mr. Obama asks you to serve in that capacity, you would agree to at least one term.:)

Wednesday, 16 April, 2008  
Blogger Chris Borokowski said...

Bread and circuses!

How do we reverse this downward spiral?

Wednesday, 16 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Chris,
This will resolve on its own somehow, either in peoples revolt or another more despotic government, which will resamble other desperate situations. Or collapse of USA as a country, Remember where there is a will there is the deal ( USSR anybody). When it did not serve powers, they dissolved it.

I hope not. I love my country. I hope the solution is enough of good people getting up of their you know what and telling the government. This is it . I is not going to work the old way. You need to be accountable. Scratch the FED , make multy-party possible, Make the democracy work or totalitarianism is coming.

Good Trading

Wednesday, 16 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anti-globalism said...

I completely agree with the author; the system itself is corrupt and we don't have time to blame "enemies" for problems we've created ourselves. A complete societal reform is the only way to go.

Wednesday, 16 April, 2008  
Blogger Nick Lento said...

This post has been removed by the author.

Wednesday, 16 April, 2008  
Blogger Nick Lento said...

Just saw the debate.

Obama kicked ass on this "issue". It will backfire on Hillary.

I don't think the PA voters will be as shallow and stupid and easily manipulated as the McCain and Clinton campaigns may believe them to be.

In an ironic sense, going through all this crap may have the effect of strengthening the Obama campaign for the general election.

If he loses 10% of the diehard Clinton supporters; that's ok as he'll pick up more from the independents, Republicans and from the people who have avoided politics for many years because they have felt disgusted, disillusioned and...yes, bitter.....but who will be registering and coming out to vote in November.

Sadly, Bush will have left our next president a horrible mess.....it wouldn't be bitterness to allow the next congress to finally hold proper hearings that just might get to the bottom of Bush's mis-administration; it would be the pursuit of justice.

What most of us know in our gut is that this administration truly is what Kerry proclaimed, in a rare moment of total candor, "a bunch of crooks and liars".

Anyone who isn't bitter and disgusted and pissed off about the terrible/horrendous consequences of the bush misadministration is either delusional or already filthy rich and without conscience.

Wednesday, 16 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Nick-Lento,
You seem to be sensible, sensitive and all around American guy. Thank god...

But I need to ask you question, besides the fact that OBAMA is less implicated ( had not had time?), what makes you think that the stratege of voting the less bad "for the moement" has/will work?

CLinton stood for HOPE. He + Dr Reich( had not had much choice I presume) presided on the worst outsorcing , NAFTA era. Transfered best of our TECHNOLIGIES ( defnce , communications ) to CHINA, but looked like he was a golden boy.

Fool me once, foll me twice...

How many times?

What makes you think OBAMA will not end up in the pockets of the same SOPITALISTS as everybody last 50 years have?

He is a democratic candidate not Jesus Party.

Why are you ready to write the blank check again AMERICA. Home many times, good looking young men will screw you before you understand that PRESIDENTS do not govern, those that put them in WHITE HOUSE, do... WOW!

What a difficult concept to grasp.

So, yeah , what do I suggest?

Here is what.

Ask very specifically of OBAMA and require pledge about:


1) Stop Deficit Spending.
2) Return Social Security MOney to owners, stop the theft.
3) Stop pandering groups and espuse generic good ness for USA
4) Stop FED from destruction of USA and its savers and citizens.

If he is able to answer, I would love him, embrace hime , make him my savier.

But, if Dr. Reich is any indication how politicians answer( or do not) the questions, I am afraid you will be fooled again.

Brother love your enthusiasm. Would hate to see you disapointed again.

Good Trading My Dear Nick

Thursday, 17 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

WHy is your solution always to spend more money? Education for example is generally well funded. Perhaps if teachers were accountable?

Thursday, 17 April, 2008  
Blogger Nick said...

To Anonymous 2:12

First, thanks for the kind words.

Obama is not perfect.

He is good.

He is better than Hillary.

He is lots better than McCain, who would bring us into a world war and totally destroy our economy.

If Hillary steals the nomination by using underhanded negative attacks on Obama....I will be pissed off with her; but will still support her over McCAin.

We are fighting for survival and can't afford the luxury of allowing "the perfect to become the enemy of the good".

Obama will grow in office.

IF the American people push him...he'll listen. He's not a completely crystallized character; and that's a good thing.

Thursday, 17 April, 2008  
Anonymous Worker Bee said...

"Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration."

-Abraham Lincoln

Lincoln was a radical!

Or this.

"I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. . . . corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed."

- Abraham Lincoln, Nov. 21, 1864
(letter to Col. William F. Elkins)

"by working upon the prejudices of the people"

Seems Lincoln understood republicans and the press well, and I notice they don't hold him up as an example? But rather that half baked actor. The one that said deficits didn't matter.

Thursday, 17 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think that most people realize that Barack Obama is one of us, but some people don't, and I don't get it. Elitist? He was raised by his grandmother after his dad abandoned him. That doesn't sound like a rich-person's story to me! Usually we give credit to people who manage to succeed in life after being raised in those circumstances. Flag pin? Hey, to each his own. If you want to wear a flag pin to show your patriotism, then more power to you. But if anyone tells me that I don't love my country because I don't wear a flag pin, then they can meet me outside and we can discuss it further.

Sure, I don't agree with everything that Barack Obama is about, but I would rather have him representing me than 100-million-dollar Hillary or married-into-money McCain. What the heck do they know about my life?

Thursday, 17 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Where did the money go? To the top."

Anyone notice that our national Labs are being decimated in this way? Our government laboratories like LLNL are being taken over by private firms, like Betchtel, who are firing the scientists and engineers and replacing them with overpaid corporate executives.

Friday, 18 April, 2008  
Anonymous Caleb Christian said...

Professor,

Great post. We all respect your work with the Clintons, regardless of party affiliation. Your endorsement will be significant, I suspect heralded by the Obama campaign.

On the subject of his comments and especially with regards to his comment on religion I have a couple of observations. The first is that we cannot possibly know, regardless of airtime, what is going on in the private lives of candidates (i.e. any celebrity) and we make judgments based on perception. His two books, redemption, his orthodox family life, etc. seem to suggest that faith and religion have a deep significance to Barack. I think people are looking for fighting words and picking out the words "small town" and "clinging" when I think what he was saying was the sense of alienation is universal and we tend to hold on to things that are real (e.g. some of the most rousing, joyous churches are in depressed inner cities). I agree that we are spending too much energy on this, including myself!

Take care, CC

Friday, 18 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Right on Dr. Reich. You hit the nail directly on the head, especially given the spectacle of the 4/16 debate.

Some media pundits are lining up to dismiss Obamas negativity towards the debate moderators as merely whining, about being asked "relevant" questions, that "need to be answered." It is not whining , it is frustration.

I share Obama's frustration. In that debate I wanted to hear about gas prices and the War and the economy and housing, not about Reverand Wright's patriotism.

Some people in the media don't get it, or choose not to get it to keep up their ratings. The very reason Obama has grown his base of supporters to such extraordinary numbers, is that many people in this country are struggling and are bitter and are fed up with the old politics and the preoccupation with b.s.

It is time to get down and talk about and solve the enormous problems facing this country. We do not have time to waste on silly issues like whether Obama wears a Flag pin on his lapel!

Friday, 18 April, 2008  
Blogger Eric said...

Unemployment under 6%, GDP still not negative...not surging as previous years...perhaps stagnant but not declining, oil skyrocketing...sounds like 1977 all over again! We recovered and have thrived. KEEP GOVERNMENT OUT and let the markets take care of themselves...THEY ALWAYS DO!

Friday, 18 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I notice, somebody, like Dr, Reich,
Deleting my comments.

Main points.

1) Dr Reich is MR NAFTA can not be trusted
2) Barak OBAMA, could be nice man, we do not know, but presidents do not govern we know. ( ASK CLINTON, why, he knows and said it)

So, all the excitement about a person that is spoken for by SOPITALISTS just like everybody else is misplaces and will haunt you AMERICANS.

See how fast Dr Reich will remove this.

GOod Trading

Friday, 18 April, 2008  
Blogger Bill in Providence said...

Dear Dr. Reich,

I've always perceived you as a really decent & intelligent fellow, operating in a business in which everyone else is the polar opposite of decent. This latest move of yours only heightens my respect for you.

Gawd, I wish our country had more in power like you!!

Thank you, thank you, thank you.

Bill in Providence

Friday, 18 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Bill in providence

Is there somebody in providence that lost the livelyhood, cause of the GLOBALISATION without preparation ( remember, I do not fault the GLOBALISATION, just the way it was done). Do you ever go to the same OHIO/PENN which OBAMA talks about. IF DR. REICH high integrity then, he would have resigned ( remember ONIEL, he resigned as treasury and wrote the book).

I respect DR. REICH(CLINTON would not listen to him, if/when resiting NAFTA), but can not trust him, should have resigned then

Good Trading

Friday, 18 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is definitely the type of analysis missing from all of the so called "network" coverage of this political season. Our country is in serious trouble but, as long as there is a buck to be made, some supposedly knowledgeable people like Tim Russert and almost all the people at FOX news, just to name a few, are feigning complete ignorance and trying to pull wool over our eyes. I hope there are enough Americans who can now see through the intentional manipulation of the people. Thank you, Dr. Reich!

Friday, 18 April, 2008  
Anonymous Rizzo Tees said...

This campaign hasn't been the least bit nasty. No Willie Horton, hardly any fearmongering

Friday, 18 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

His comments at the Getty mansion reveal a lot about the person as does his conduct yesterday when, during a very public forum, in front of the cameras, he gave Clinton the finger.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DygBj4Zw6No

It was an absolute disgrace and shows the level of maturity we are dealing with. This is a new low and demonstrates why he is not fit to be president. I used to be a big fan of yours but if you are going to condone such behavior from a presidential candidate, I regret to say, I lose all the respect I had for you.

Friday, 18 April, 2008  
Blogger Art A Layman said...

anon 1:43:

The users of percentages often exhibit a lack of understanding or a desire for obfuscation.

Over a period of three decades what has happened to the population? If, at point A, we have 10% poverty in a population of 200 million and, at point B, that 10% has risen on a population of 300 million, does that not suggest that poverty is increasing?

That it has remained constant in percentage terms is little solace to the increased number of folks living in that condition.

Analysis is intended to provide a better understanding of issues. To hinge an assertion on the existence of two similar numbers appearing over a time span offers little more than a recognition of what a percent sign looks like.

Friday, 18 April, 2008  
Anonymous The OS2Guy said...

You're an absolute fool and traitor, if as the press is reporting this morning, you plan on announcing your support for Hussein Obama, after the Clintons have done so much for you and your career. I'll never believe in you again and work against you in the future. If it isn't true and you step out in support of the Clintons I will be happy to continue to support your endeavors.

Friday, 18 April, 2008  
Blogger seiun said...

Dear Mr. Reich,

Thanks for a great blog and a great post. And I agree with your conclusion 100%: old media is irrelevant. The Fifth Estate has put them on notice that the story no longer belongs to them.

Friday, 18 April, 2008  
Blogger KYJurisDoctor said...

Thanks for speaking to Idiots about the reality of what Obama said. I look forward to your endorsement of him, so that more signals will be sent to BILLARY Clinton that her campaign is O-V-E-R!

OsiSpeaks.com

Friday, 18 April, 2008  
Blogger Melanie said...

This is so stupid. We hardly know anything about Obama but if anyone questions him about the people he keeps company with, the wrinkles in his words, the underlining bitterness that his wife has (and I think he has) than it's everyone else's problem. Everyone is so quick to cover him. I truly think the Democrats will rue the day they swept Obama into office unvetted.

Friday, 18 April, 2008  
Blogger Art A Layman said...

worker bee:

When using quotes, especially ascribing words to historical figures of great renown, one should make sure that the attributions are correct.

Friday, 18 April, 2008  
Anonymous Shirley Keller said...

I hope it is true you are going to support Barack Obama as the post expressed, which is how I found your blog and read your "Bitterness" piece. I was sickened with "Meet the Press", and with the Democratic Debat, not so much with BO or HRK, but with the questioning by the pundants whose tone was inciting, rather than questioning with dignity. They stuck to the gossip questions forever before they got to any substance. I don't expect miracles from Obama but I do sense a sincere desire to move us in a more positive direction, and if that happens change is possible down the road.

Friday, 18 April, 2008  
Anonymous Misha said...

Dr. Reich,
I'm a first time visitor to your blog (via a Huffpost link), and have always been a huge fan of yours. As an Obama volunteer....your endorsement is much appreciated, and your ideas..even more so.
In regards to the media...you are right on. Also, let's not forget the media's "echo-ing" of taking all the B.S. that came out of Bush's team in the lead up to the Iraq fiasco as "news"...no investigative journalism there....

Friday, 18 April, 2008  
Blogger Ira in Texas said...

Dr. Reich:

The economy is broken as you say, but do you feel that raising capital gains taxes to 28% as Senator Obama proposed in the Philadelphia debate, rather than capping it at 20% the level it was at when you left the Clinton Adninistration, is the right way to go. Senator Obama's bad judgment on the economy and healthcare reform is why I support Hillary Clinton, not nonissues like a stupid flag pin. Senator Clinton's vast knowledge of the markets, mortgage reform(months before it was even on the radar) and sovereign wealth funds, as she proved on Mad Money should persuade you that she is the candidate who desrves your full endorsement sir.

Friday, 18 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I see the little man is going suport the man who says nothing. This should be no surprise as both are Socialists

Friday, 18 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sect. Reich, these words reasonate most profoundly with me. Thank you.

Friday, 18 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Good for you, Dr. Reich.
And I look forward to your announcement at 1pm today.

Friday, 18 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hillary Clinton will work to solve all the problems mentioned in this article. Let's put her to work!

Friday, 18 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dr. Reich,

I, too, am 61 years old and grew up in Pennsylvania. In my case, it was a small town in southwestern PA. That part of the state has been in terrible economic shape since the 1970's. I have seen friends move from one blue collar job to another, with longer commutes and lower pay as factories closed. These people, and not just in Pennsylvania, have been abandoned and let down in the past few decades by all the power structure of this country -- Democratic and Republican, business and labor unions. I have no doubt that there is a great deal of bitterness among them. And, yes, they cling to guns, religion and antipathy to people who aren't like them; have done so for a long time. Such attitudes are amplified by hard times, surely no one can debare that. I think what bothers people is that taking Mr. Obama's comment out of context appears to attribute their beliefs and attitudes to bitterness alone. On the whole, I believe the working class, rural and small town people of Pennsylvania, and indeed this nation, are proud, hard working and perservering. There are no doubt many of them who are bitter about many things, but I believe their religion, their love of guns (many, are hunters) and even thir antipathy for people who are different from them are deep and long-held. That makes Obama's comment, especially when taken out of context and broadcast nationally, a little hard to take but nonetheless true. Mostly, I blame those who took that honest observation and made it into something it never was meant to be.

ms planet

Friday, 18 April, 2008  
Blogger RJH said...

Well said. I never supported Bill Clinton but admired your policies and work. Are you up for another cabinet term? I can't imagine you're not on Obama's list of potentials.

Friday, 18 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You're a good man!

Friday, 18 April, 2008  
Blogger Jesus Is God said...

WOW! Du jamais vu au Etats Unis!

Great insight! I think these journalists should read this blog. It's shocking to see that the economy is in peril and all the media talks about is petty gossips. Looking at the dumping China is doing here. Visit any super market and you are greeted with made in China. The Japanese have invaded the country with their cars and economically, the US is suffering and the people spend time trying to twist statements made by others for political gain.

Friday, 18 April, 2008  
Anonymous Walldog said...

Mr. Reich,

If what I read over at the Huffingtonpost.com is true, please allow me to thank you in advance for publicly supporting and endorsing Senator Obama's campaign.

You have had no bigger fan than me since your days in the Clinton Administration and America owes you much gratitude for your role in ensuring our countries prosperity in the 1990's.

Beyond supporting this singular American to be our Commander in Chief, I hope you will consider - and that he will offer you - a role in President Obama's administration.

Our country needs Senator Obama in the White House. And we could greatly benefit from a return of Secretary Reich.

Friday, 18 April, 2008  
Blogger Randy E said...

Thank you for giving us a view above the pig pen.

Friday, 18 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thank you! I am a rural white older American female. Husband with masters degree, I have a B.A. and am working for a non profit for 25 years. This year our health insurance went to $3,000.00 deductable per family member. My co-pay is up and my monthly deduction which used to be zero is about $200.00.

Our income has always been very good. My husband who has run a successful business for 35 years has seen a reduction of about 35% in earnings.

We are paying for two kids in college and are paying off child number one. Do I sound bitter?

I am voting for Obama!! I am tired of the fighting in Washington. I think Obama is the best hope to confront real problems and bring people on all sides together.

Can we get to the solution side?

Friday, 18 April, 2008  
Anonymous truth seeker said...

This is a condescending remark that belittles people of faith.

Considering Obama's own faith, this misrepresentation of what he said is stupid and intellectually dishonest.

Saturday, 19 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thank You, Thank You, Thank You.

As a former Clinton supporter it took courage to do what you did yesterday. I wish other supporters would come out and support Obama. Unfortunetley they are afraid of the Clinton's.

Saturday, 19 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What a traitor! The Clintons give him a job and he turns on them. Just goes to show that people with no loyalty to anyone gravitate toward Obama. Obama threw his own white grandmother under the bus, the one who helped raise him and paid for him to go to a private high school.
You're pathetic Reich. I listened to that debate and Obama just stuttered and said nothing as usual. Just his crap about "hope"! Obama and his wife are haters of white people and all you liberal whites who feel we need to make up for something we did not do personally, you will find out if he gets in the White House. Michelle Obama despises white people. If you can't hear it in her speeches then you've got your head in the sand.
Reich, Obama is a whiner. He cries and pisses and moans when someone says anything about him. My God, do we need a cry baby like that running America? NO! He doesn't have a set of balls. Hillary has more balls than Obama and Obama is just pathetic. Obama in his OWN book says Islam first. If we get bombed again, you'll be the reason along with the others who back Obama.
I'm sure the moderator won't allow this because that is how liberal facists do. If you speak against them, they shut you up.

Saturday, 19 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Obama hates white people. You hear that white people. Barack and Michelle Obama hate you. Get over it! I thought I'd put it to you plain and simple because you can't see past "Oh, finally a black person who can be President!" Yippee!
Sure, if Colin Powell ran but not Obama. He and Michelle have so much loathing for the white race that it rips them apart to even try to suppress it.
You'll find out if he gets in the White House and then it's too late. You think affirmative action is bad now, whites will not even stand a slight chance of getting a job. No one, and I mean no one, should get a job simply based on the color of their skin. How is that not racist in itself? Explain that to me. And Obama said it, he's big on affirmative action, more so than Hillary. So, when a doctor who holds your life in their hands is there because of the color of his skin and you pay the ultimate price, you won't be able to say a word. All that will be left is your family wondering what the hell happened. Yes, affirmative action is a good thing. Give jobs to people who aren't qualified. Makes sense to me, NOT!!

Saturday, 19 April, 2008  
Blogger pdxtwa said...

"His comments at the Getty mansion reveal a lot about the person as does his conduct yesterday when, during a very public forum, in front of the cameras, he gave Clinton the finger."

Oh my gosh. My wife scratches her cheek quite frequently using her middle finger, because as she says, "it's the longest one."

I, myself, give Mrs. Clinton the finger every time I see her pollyanna cheshire cat grin looking at me from the TV screen. Can't help doing the same thing when I see "first husband" Bill being his folksy self either.

This is better behavior?

""Screw 'em," Hillary said about working-class white southerners.
"You don't owe them a thing, Bill. They're doing nothing for you; you don't have to do anything for them." Camp David 1995

I think Senator Obama will make a great President. Thanks Professor Reich for speaking out.

Saturday, 19 April, 2008  
Blogger pdxtwa said...

"You think affirmative action is bad now, whites will not even stand a slight of getting a job."

What total paranoia. First of all, Senator Obama is as much "white" as he is "black."

Obama, who graduated from Columbia University and Harvard Law School, has said he is firmly behind efforts to expand diversity, particularly in higher education. However, he has implied that such programs should be reexamined, and perhaps be more closely tied to class instead of race.

Asked if his young children would be candidates for affirmative action when they reach college, Obama said their middle-class upbringing should disqualify them.

"I think that my daughters should probably be treated by any [college] admissions officer as folks who are pretty advantaged," Obama said in an interview with ABC News. "We should take into account white kids who have been disadvantaged and have grown up in poverty and shown themselves to have what it takes to succeed.

Obama's acknowledgement - that some white students may deserve preferences, while some black students might not - undercuts the notion that the effects of past racial discrimination are still a bar to opportunity for most black people."

Abigail Thernstrom, a Manhattan Institute senior fellow and longtime critic of affirmative action, said
"having Obama as president would support the notion that "we do not need racial double standards because blacks can make it in every walk of American life."

"It changes the conversation for the better," Thernstrom said of Obama's success. "It sends an important message about white racism, and the level of white racism in this country, if you've got a huge number of whites voting for a black man."

Hollinger said having Obama defend affirmative action could be tricky for Democrats, particularly with Obama's apparent willingness to consider class as a factor.

"Times have changed," said Deneen Borelli, a fellow at Project 21, a group of black conservatives. "There are plenty of opportunities available, but to have this crutch . . . is just wrong. It's discriminatory on all ends."

Senator Obama will be an intelligent breath of fresh air. Stop the fear and hate tactics. Not this time.


www.barackobama.com

written by a "typical white person."

Saturday, 19 April, 2008  
Blogger pdxtwa said...

"My God, do we need a cry baby like that running America? NO! He doesn't have a set of balls. Hillary has more balls than Obama and Obama is just pathetic."

She surely does have "more Balls." She needed them in her defense of the "missing files defense," when she stated 54 times " I don't recall."

The long-missing Rose Law Firm billing records found in January are potentially more troublesome for Mrs. Clinton. From the NY Times article July 11, 1996.

"Federal investigators had subpoenaed them in 1994, but the Rose firm found after a search that they were not in its files. They remained lost for nearly two years, until a White House aide disclosed in January that she had found photocopies of them months before, on a table in a book room in the tightly restricted Clinton family residence.

The aide said that the papers had not been there a few days before and that she had packed them away without knowing their significance. She did not know who put them there. Mrs. Clinton said she did not do it.

She presumably repeated that in January to a Federal grand jury when it opened an investigation into whether the records had been deliberately hidden to obstruct justice, and summoned her to testify.

The incident only heightened the impression that the Clintons had not been forthcoming about Whitewater. The inquiry has been marked by repeated instances when records were initially denied to investigators, incomplete or misleading answers were given and old statements were recanted when new evidence came up.

The White House has explained those instances as accidents and errors, saying it has nothing to hide. And indeed that explanation has a ring of truth because of the still-unanswered question about Whitewater: What was there to hide, anyway?"

No more Clinton drama in the White House please. Bill wants to set up shop in the Lincoln Bedroom, and it will be him, answering those 3 AM phone calls that come from his offshore clients.

Saturday, 19 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Those at the "top" are the ones controlling the agenda of the networks so it is understandable that they have no interest in focusing on real problems; but instead want to keep people entertained and distracted as they amass even greater wealth. And, the people who are easily distracted by the network games are also to blame since they have made a conscious choice to spend their free time on flash rather than substance. The vanity and shallowness of the average couch potato American is quite disturbing. But, I digress.

What's Russert's excuse? Nobody is holding a gun to his head. And he's not stupid. He knows full well that this focus on garbage and petty crap does not serve American well. Yet, he goes right along with his the game of keeping Americans focused away from those things that actually affect their lives. And I'm growing tired of the Russerts of this world writing books later to tell us how the game worked. We know! Do something about it NOW. Don't compound your sin of being a perpetuator of the game by generating a book telling us when it matters not. Do something NOW. Quit. Raise the flag while you are still involved. Or maybe everybody does have a price.

Tuesday, 22 April, 2008  
Blogger MBDad said...

To reply to one of the comments here:

Anonymous said..

"Prof. Reich,

I agree with you only so far..."

Any person who is happy or content with ALL of the words uttered out of their mouths 24/7 in public or in perceived privacy please step forward! I cannot begin to imagine what it is like to be under that type of microscope under exhausting circumstances, but I err on giving people the benefit of the doubt on slipping of the tongue.

To say that Obama is an elitist is ludicrous when you examine his stances, statements and actions over his life's body of work!

As a moderate Christian I do not have a problem with a statement that says that a person "clings to religion". My God and my religion are indeed an anchor to the storms in my life. As many folks felt after 9/11, I remember a heavy feeling of despair and depression. Shocked and thinking what had happened and in the bigger picture, what it might mean to my children in the future. I clung to my religion like a drowning sailor to a life preserver!

Obama’s statement does not show that he is self-superior or an elitest! It shows (inelegantly) that he listens and that he understands.

Tuesday, 22 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Shame on You Senator Hilary Clinton: Character Matters!
White Water Scandal; Flip-Flopping on NAFTA (in order to get the blue collar vote); Playing the gender card to get votes from women and using a Fake story of a woman who supposedly was denied healthcare. It’s unbelievable that you are attacking the character and integrity of Senator Obama. Shame on you!

Read about White Water:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/whitewater/whitewater.htm

Wednesday, 23 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This was published in the Kitsap Sun on 4-24-2008
The media Swiftboated Kerry in 2004 and are doing the same to Obama as shown here.
http://rff.smugmug.com/gallery/4791197_iogaV#284533307_ueE9e

Thursday, 24 April, 2008  
Anonymous Buzz said...

I am so pleased, Dr. Reich, that I have discovered your blog. I have just been unceremoniously booted from the Democratic Daily blog by it's originator-Pamela Levy. If anybody says anything positive about Senator Obama or downs Hillary, she takes major offense. Her advocacy for Hillary goes far past support and borders on the fanitical.
In my humble opinion any decent blog should welcome diverse views, in it's attempt to generate postings. Apparently I was naive in regards to Pamela's blog.
That being said, I want to go on record in my belief that Senator Obama is a true visionary. We have not seen an inspirational candidate like this since the "Camelot" days of JFK. And, oh yes, I do remember that era well. Being 64 years of age, I am not one of the "stary eyed" young Americans which the Clintons enjoy portraying as "living a fairy tail". Barack is the only person who has both the integrity and intelligence to pull us out of the Bush abyss. Sen. Obama is showing his cool by not responding to Hillary's mud slinging!! Let's Rock With Barack! Buzz

Saturday, 26 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dr. Reich,

We have to get back to the promotion of individual responsibility in this country.

Yes, Dr. Reich, I agree with you that the media gravitates toward amplifying issues not relevant to the solution of this country’s serious problems. However, we must remember that media’s simple goal is to continue to exist. Like any business, media survives by making a profit and makes a profit by providing the customer the product he or she wants. Media is therefore a reflection of its audience, and the fact that media discusses irrelevant issues during a time when economic policy, for example, is so important, demonstrates a society that is not educated in economics.

I believe education is the number one solution to this country’s ills. Those politicians who continue to promise the middle class that government can deliver higher wages, etc. are doing more harm than the media ever will. The message our leaders need to send to their constituents is that the individual is responsible for his or her own improvement, and that the government is hired by the taxpayers to facilitate that improvement through the provision of a productive and efficient education system.

The recent “bitterness” saga is a fine example of the media’s desire to make a profit, and the public’s fool hearty purchasing of the media product. I find it perplexing that so many in this country find the recent remarks about guns and religion by Senator Obama as elitist. American history shows that bitterness over the prevailing European institutions governing religion and state were among the chief catalysts for the settling of the USA & the structuring of its government. Our Constitution and Bill of Rights express in no uncertain terms the importance of guns & religion to our forefathers. I believe that clinging to guns and religion is an integral part of the fabric & history of this country – why people have a problem with this is a mystery to me.

This country was established on the principal of individual responsibility & freedom from over-bearing government. This American notion needs to be re-awakened.

As for a progressive tax system, Adam Smith himself proposed a single tax bracket, not a progressive system: “The subjects of every state ought to contribute towards the support of the government, as nearly as possible, in proportion to their respective abilities...”

Monday, 28 April, 2008  
Blogger Art A Layman said...

anon 12:22:

If you are going to quote Adam Smith one would think you would expand your knowledge of him.

Another excerpt from dear Mr. Smith per, The Wealth of Nations:
"It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion".

I've looked long and hard and fail to find that "single tax rate" you mention.

Monday, 28 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

RE: Adam Smith

A flat rate by definition requires proportionality. For the sake of simplicity, assume gentleman #1 earns $3 and pays $0.30 in income tax and gentleman #2 earns $6 and pays $0.60 in income tax. Both gentlemen are paying the same proportion (10%) of their income in taxes and the flat rate in this example is 10%

The expanse of knowledge I may or may not have of Adam Smith is immaterial here. The pertinent fact is that his words which I quoted describe a flat tax system.

Monday, 28 April, 2008  
Blogger Art A Layman said...

anon 2:53:

Your interpretive powers are questionable at best.

First of all, by saying:

“The subjects of every state ought to contribute towards the support of the government, as nearly as possible, in proportion to their respective abilities...” does not necessarily reflect a flat tax implication. If that were his intention he would have said:
"...in the same proportion to their respective abilities..."

My interpretation is substantiated by the passage I quoted from Adam Smith from the same book. There are other passages where Smith favors higher rates of taxes on the wealthy.

Adam Smith was not a flat tax proponent and you will find no experts who would interpret him as such. Steve Forbes is a flat tax proponent but Steve Forbes ain't no Adam Smith.

Practice your reading skills or your comprehension skills.

Monday, 28 April, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I believe the concept of this blog is to exchange ideas, and not to make derogatory remarks about each others’ reading & comprehension skills.

Your other points are well taken and argued convincingly. However, the term “proportion” means having a constant ratio, and in the passage I quoted, Smith used “proportion” in singular tense, thereby specifying a single proportion to apply. While Smith did not say "...in the same proportion to their respective abilities...", neither did he say “…in different proportions to their respective abilities…”

Tuesday, 29 April, 2008  

Post a Comment

<< Home