Obama for President
The formal act of endorsing a candidate is generally (and properly)limited to editorial pages and elected officials whose constituents might be influenced by their choice. The rest of us shouldn't assume anyone cares. My avoidance of offering a formal endorsement until now has also been affected by the pull of old friendships and my reluctance as a teacher and commentator to be openly partisan. But my conscience won't let me be silent any longer.
I believe that Barack Obama should be elected President of the United States.
Although Hillary Clinton has offered solid and sensible policy proposals, Obama's strike me as even more so. His plans for reforming Social Security and health care have a better chance of succeeding. His approaches to the housing crisis and the failures of our financial markets are sounder than hers. His ideas for improving our public schools and confronting the problems of poverty and inequality are more coherent and compelling. He has put forward the more enlightened foreign policy and the more thoughtful plan for controlling global warming.
He also presents the best chance of creating a new politics in which citizens become active participants rather than cynical spectators. He has energized many who had given up on politics. He has engaged young people to an extent not seen in decades. He has spoken about the most difficult problems our society faces, such as race, without spinning or simplifying. He has rightly identified the armies of lawyers and lobbyists that have commandeered our democracy, and pointed the way toward taking it back.
Finally, he offers the best hope of transcending the boundaries of class, race, and nationality that have divided us. His life history exemplifies this, as do his writings and his record of public service. For these same reasons, he offers the best possibility of restoring America's moral authority in the world.
I believe that Barack Obama should be elected President of the United States.
Although Hillary Clinton has offered solid and sensible policy proposals, Obama's strike me as even more so. His plans for reforming Social Security and health care have a better chance of succeeding. His approaches to the housing crisis and the failures of our financial markets are sounder than hers. His ideas for improving our public schools and confronting the problems of poverty and inequality are more coherent and compelling. He has put forward the more enlightened foreign policy and the more thoughtful plan for controlling global warming.
He also presents the best chance of creating a new politics in which citizens become active participants rather than cynical spectators. He has energized many who had given up on politics. He has engaged young people to an extent not seen in decades. He has spoken about the most difficult problems our society faces, such as race, without spinning or simplifying. He has rightly identified the armies of lawyers and lobbyists that have commandeered our democracy, and pointed the way toward taking it back.
Finally, he offers the best hope of transcending the boundaries of class, race, and nationality that have divided us. His life history exemplifies this, as do his writings and his record of public service. For these same reasons, he offers the best possibility of restoring America's moral authority in the world.


125 Comments:
Dear Americans: I fully support what robert rich has carefully stated here. I have been saying it. We really have only once choice and a good one for the President of the United States of America, and I am calling on all Americans stand behind this man. I am a staunch conservative and I know God's hand when I see one. Barack is a gift to America at such a time as this. Let me say few more things besides what Robert rightfully stated. As a strategic analyst and Professor in the area for many years, Obama is by far the better manager or will be a better manager of this nation than both Hillary and McCain. In fact, Obama is the one who is MUCH READY TO BE PRESIDENT ON DAY ONE than McCain or Clinton. McCain is not a manager and he will find it difficult to acquire the needed skills quickly. Both McCain and Hillaryand McCain (but more so for McCain) are more likely to commit management and national security blunders than Obama. As a Professor of strategic management and international business for over 16 years and have the honor of analyzing behavior, let me rate McCain, Hillary, and Obama on the following dimensions:
MANAGING THE NATION== McCain 45%, Hillary 55%, Obama 95%
PATRIOTISM == McCain 100%, Hillary 100%, Obama 100%
NATIONAL SECURITY== McCain 60%, Hillary 60%, Obama 98%
LOVE OF ISRAEL== McCain 100%, Hillary 100%, Obama 100%
ABILITY TO MAKE AMERICA BETTER OVERALL== McCain 45%, Hillary 65%, Obama 98%
[Feel free to call me for explanation]
I want you to know that the above factors are interdependent. Although I am a staunch conservative, I am calling on America to vote for this man Obama for use in rescuing, stabilizing, and prospering America again!!! People, there is nothing wrong about being a soldier for this nation, but do not commit suicide or even mass destruction of lives by equating soldiering with the complexities of running a nation. Ronald Reagan was no soldier but he was the best President of USA I witnessed in my life time; I am 52 now. Fortunately for America, this man Obama is an amalgam of J.F. Kennedy and Reagan. Both of these qualities are in Obama, and he will intrinsically and naturally showcase these qualities as the next President of this USA. I urge all states to vote for him overwhelmingly. I am a deep-seated conservative Christian, but I refuse to let one or two disagreement make me to fail to recommend this man to our nation at This critical hour!!! Obama will be used by God to shine America again in the world and to prosper America again. We better behave this time. he is extremely sensible, reasonable, loving, and has the ability to adjust given necessary contingencies. Feel free to contact me...Dr. FSAOS [Strongblood]
thank you Dr.Reich. we will remember your support.
There was a verse in a movie that stated, my greatest gift is to return Rome to herself, return her to a Republic. Our Democracy has been stolen from us. Unfortunately, Mr. Bush has been wrong about EVERYTHING, and Mr. McCain see to follow in his foot steps. They must be stopped before we are turned inti a police/Nazi state.
Dr. Reich,
Congratulations on your stepping forward in support of Barack Obama!
Obama's unpretentious intelligence is obvious ... his Emotional IQ is more impressive to me. He's a man comfortably at peace with himself and his surroundings who demonstrates a discerning maturity beyond his age ... no doubt nurtured by his unique multi-cultural background.
I believe he has the backbone, humor and cultural equanimity to
handle the narcissistic character assassination tactics and latest Media HYPE and NO CONTENT games, so poisoning our political-journalistic system.
I've lived half of my life in Europe, mostly in The Netherlands in recent years. Like all my American relations, we are quite taken in by the refreshingly natural, civil, and rational social-political discourse here.Obama has these qualities in adundance. He appeals to most for his down-to-earth humanness and integrity. He's overwhelmingly liked by Europeans and Democratic/
Independent American voters abroad. He comes across as a person of clarity, good management skills and a genuine human touch that resonates broadly to all genders, races, and ages. He's right on with his message that sensible "bottoms-up-democracy" needs reviving in America.
As one American acquaintance said, "He knows the pains of Main Street, and is not controlled by Wall Street."
This is great. Wow! Robert is such a bold leader. This is what America should have especially after going through difficult years under the Bush regime. With People like Robert speaking out, I'm now believing that there's hope that America will rise up again.
Check out more election news
http://empowertube.blogspot.com/
I appreciate the careful words that were chosen here, and the careful consideration given to the choice between these two candidates.
At the end of the day - at least over the last 4-6 weeks - the democratic campaign has become a Campaign About Nothing. No substance, no issues ... just two candidates clawing at each other.
However, while one candidate - Barack Obma - has done his best to turn the dialog toward John McCain's pandering policies (a summergas tax "holiday"? Heads-up John ... you're not currently the President!), Senator Clinton has done the only thing she can: attempt to tear Barack Obama down.
It's clear at this stage that the Clintons (yes, both of them) realize that the only move they have left is to diminish Barack Obama. Anyone ... ANYONE ... can be torn down if the light is shown brightly enough. We're electing a President, not a god. So where does this get us?
Democratic party logistics aside, Senator Obama is the candidate who can take the country forward. What Senator Clinton and her supporters seem to miss is the fact that the "change" that's being called for in the country isn't an empty call ... it's not charisma ... it's not academic ... it's a desire to move beyond the last 30 years of dem/rep politics.
No serious Obama supporter belives that the guy walks on water. But they do think that he's the only candidate that can break the country out of the malaise ... just because of who he is.
And who is he? He's a constitutional scholar and professor, a Harvard Grad, a community activist, an accomplised lawyer, a State Senator, a Federal Senator, and he's run a presidential campaign like no one in recent memory. Oh yeah ... and his policies are sound, grounded, and while they may differ slightly from Clinton's, they're firmly progressive.
The country has given Clinton 8 years. The country has given Bush/Cheney 8 years. Let's try something totally different.
Perfectly stated... from the heart and the head. Well done!
On Thursday I thought that since we have entered new territory with Senators Obama and Clinton vying for the nomination, I hope the presidential debates this summer break new territory: I would appreciate seeing Senator Obama debate the real source of the Republican Party: Fox CEO Roger Ailes and then Rush Limbaugh, drug addict. Get right down to brass tacks.
On Friday I watched PBS's Jim Lehrer News Hour. David Brooks was hilarious. His comment about wishing the Democrat candidates hadn't stated they wouldn't raise taxes while in office, wishing they hadn't boxed themselves in, sounded just like Roger Ailes had send out the marching orders for how David will march and talk between now and November. I thought, gee, what if Obama does get elected and does stick to what he said about taxes.
Someone on the Washington Post blog put it best: people who were unemployed soon after Bush took office are still unemployed now, and the Republicans don't care.
Let's take just one point at a time: "He [Obama] has energized many who had given up on politics. He has engaged young people to an extent not seen in decades".
By my previous calculations (from CNN numbers), the popular vote difference is less than 0.3%. That means Hillary is practically matching every vote Obama is getting so far. Now, why then is Obama the only one getting the credit for "energizing" voters to participate?
I am very disappointed in your endorsement for Obama.
The press has destroyed the Clintons and now I feel like the superdelegates are listening.
The only station that finally was able to display Obama's qualities and issues was ABC and now they are being criticized.
Obama is very radical, has a pastor full of hatred for America. This was his mentor.
Obama has ties wth Tony Rezko of Chicago and William Ayers, a terrorist.
Reverend Wright, Obama's mentor of twenty years has embarrassed our first lady and white America.
Obama has an elitist attitude towards most of America. He has a cocky attitude from his own dislike for his grudges against American politics.
This man has his own anger problems. Show me your friends and I will show you who you are:
Tony Rezko, a criminal from Chicago that Obama has know for years.
William Ayers, a terrorist that he worked on a board with in Chicago.
Pastor Wright, a supporter of anti-Semetic, Louis Farrakhan.
Al Sharpton, fighting for the states of Florida not to seat delegates.
Michelle Obama not being proud of her country until now.
This man will never survive against a war hero, John McCain.
I am saddened that the children and the media is controlling this electiion.
I am in total agreement with "alecki"'s comments
With friends like you. Why did you have to endorse anyone? Why not just go quietly to the ballot box and cast your vote? Are you that self important? What a stab in the back for the Clintons.
Dr. Reich,
I want to thank you for this endorsement. AS someone who immigrated to the US 9.5 years ago, this administration has drained almost all hopes and dreams I have had in this nation. It felt like being in a psychologically abusive marriage and Obama has rekindled a love this president and his administration almost put out.
Dear Dr. Reich, If only the media would take the time and the space (upper right side of the front page!) to fully report on your REASONS for endorsing Senator Obama. He is the finest presidential candidate in years, with a world view that just might save us from repeating the horrific and stupid blunders of the last 8 years.
But I fear American voters will be swayed by all focus the media has given to Senator Obama's unadorned lapel, and that ultimately many white voters will follow the unspoken racist script, that "this black man does not know his place." That, I believe, is the hidden subtext underneath all the frenetic focus on his (admitted awkwardly spoken) comments about the disenfranchised white working class.
Charlotte Udziela
Older white female voter
Thank you for stepping up to the plate and making your endorsement known!
People want CHANGE!!! I'm 46 and in my whole voting career there has been a Bush or Clinton on the ticket...IT'S TIME PEOPLE!!!
Obama has already created change...and it's not even 1-20-09. Now that's change I can endorse!
So disappointed in your latest comments, Bob, and will not be buying your book -
You as a politican should know what a candidate goes through to get to an elected office - and you have to answer the questions posed to you.
You should know better.
The wonderful thing about America is that when you have strong feelings about her future, you can express them. I trust that you have taken the full opportunity to visit the blogs and witnessed the "real" lynching that has been taking place.
Come the end of the day -- when each of us is wrapped in little more than our reputations -- I would rather have Hillary's than Barack's and I pray to the God that Jews, Christians and Muslims honor each in their own unique and timeless fashion -- that Senator Clinton and each of the time tested advisors who support and defend her will also serve the America we all cherish.
If you honestly believe that she has been the only negative force in this campaign, you are choosing to overlook what is clearly there to be seen. Gerri Ferraro is no racist. Bill Clinton is no racist. You know these people. Why do you choose not to speak up for them?
Given the excruciating-to-watch tone the campaign has taken in the past few weeks, I am thrilled to see Robert Reich make an endorsement for Obama. His tone, even when he is critical, is one that offers solutions. The better path, the greater good. An endorsement from a brilliant solution-minded thinker can only auger hope for real change.
I started out supporting Hillary Clinton last year because I viewed her as a back alley, no holds barred fighter. Today, I am no longer supporting her because I believe she is in fact that and a pathological liar to boot. We have just had 8 years of self-serving happy talk and lies. We need someone to tell the truth despite the risks of doing that in our country. I don't know Obama that well. I mostly support him because he has inspired so many of the disaffected to come out and vote, especially people under 30. Frankly if Hillary manages to steal this nomination I am content to let the Republicans spend the next 4 years dealing with all of GWB's mess. I cannot compromise my principles and vote for Hillary. Electability is not the issue but integrity is.
Bravo Robert pour votre courage!!
Go Obama
From France
Camille
Thank you Mr. Reich for taking this position. It must have been a hard one, since you were on the Clinton Team for so many years. I hope people like Carvel will not call you traitor like he did Richardson. But sometimes one must follow ones heart in spite of everything. I agree with one of the writers that the Clintons are not racists. Had Obama not turned out to be in this race I certainly would have supported her, even if she does "politician" speak after so many years in the game. I have learned to accept "they" lie. Sad, but we vote for them anyway, ex: Bush twice. I hope that something else might be allowed to happen with so many young people now interested in politics. It is exciting to think about. I cannot remember an election in my 65 years where I really cannot figure out the outcome. Usually it is all decided and we the voters just go through the motions. This is good.
Just wanted to thank you for your thoughtful and pointed endorsement of Barack; its going to be exciting to watch him govern.
I am an expat in Budapest. it feels strange to be proud to be an American, again.
Thanks.
Prof. Reich,
I am still torn in support for either Democratic candidate, personally. And though I understand the pressures on you as a public figure to offer support, I fear the vitriol (a typical Democratic primary, but really important this time) may take down quite a few people.
I don't believe the Democrats can win with a Senator. On top of that, I'm concerned with Senator Obama's position on health care, in that it is very "centrist", or catering to independents. I'm immediately reminded of Truman's claim, "If you give voters a choice between a Republican and a Republican, they'll vote for the Republican every time."
Last, I'm worried that his attempt to take the nomination through caucuses (vs. direct primary elections, which he has trouble winning) and independent voters will come back to bite the Democrats in November, when those independent voters have the choice between a media-crowned independent McCain, or a new, young, African American Senator named Obama. Keep in mind the demographics of Independent voters. If you can't recall, just look up a picture of Perot's '92 campaign.
That said, I do believe the Democrats need to win this election. It is too important to lose.
Dr. Reich:
So good to see you come out of the closet. You are aware, of course, that the closet door has been open for the last 8 or 10 months. Those here heaping praises on your final determination have apparently not been reading your blog posts. The announcement is, at best, anticlimactic.
I am not one who would suggest that you depress your thoughts or actions predicated on previous friendships. I am a firm believer that emotional feelings should not govern thought, albeit a difficult hurdle for most of us.
Obama has much going for him. Many of his laudables, referenced by you, are sound and bode an improved political climate. You, as does he, get a little Valhallic, however. Your wistful conclusions of his impact on the political scene seem less the musings of a learned mind and more those of an enrapt member of the herd.
Movement conservative is not based on the invention of the smokeless cigarette. They have built strong support for their euphoric ideas, predicated as they are in whimsical economic theory and their interpretation of God's will. They will not react as "a poor player, that struts and frets his hour upon the stage and then is heard no more". They have feasted from the trough of political power and they are far from sated.
Be it Hillary or Obama who is successful, movement conservative will marshal their resources and they will fight on vehemently. Obama's inexperience on the national political stage portends a inability to be effective in the face of such an onslaught. Recent history would tend to discount your assertions of a renewed, involved citizenry. For the most part the American public views its responsibility as over once they have voted. Other than Monday morning quarterbacking, as a whole, the public seems devoid of interest in the daily machinations of political haraunging.
One could posit that the time is ripe for one of those rebellions which Jefferson spoke of. Alas, the will of the American people falls far short of that of our founders.
Obama is an orator with impressive skills. He is not a Reagan, nor a Bill Clinton, maybe not even a JFK. He is gifted, but oratory skills alone will not solve the deep seated problems this country faces. To my mind the bulk of the cultural/economic problems we face started with Reagan's terms. Bill Clinton added some exacerbating factors but all in all we are firmly entrenched in a movement conservative climate and undoing that aura will be a huge undertaking.
Hillary, by virtue of her involvement in her husband's administration, has been fire tested; Obama has not. Those who marvel at Obama's cool reserve under fire fail to notice, through his facial expressions and body language the consternation and frustration seething at the constant barrage of questions regarding his associations and perhaps, lack of good judgment. You know, as do I, he ain't seen nothing yet. The campaign will be hard enough; being effective if he wins will be even tougher.
Obama seems a good man. He appears honest and full of integrity (so did Reagan). Certainly his ideas are far preferable to me than Reagan's, but I have serious concerns about his ability to be effective. Even the smallest of missteps or catastrophes beyond his control and movement conservative will be waiting to pounce. His approach to politics is inviting but his entry to the halls of power may be premature.
There is understandable reason for politicians to be proclaiming their favorite. Those experts, theoretically outside the political maelstrom, might best abstain at this point and better position themselves to be a part of the solution whomever the eventual candidate will be. Maybe your relationship, or lack thereof, with the Clintons, leads you to the conclusion that you will not be a player in a new Clinton administration. You may be right but I would argue passionately that great progressive minds such as yours should have a voice in any Democratic administration.
The bed is made. You must now lie in it. Let us hope you are more right than wrong.
I was so happy to hear Mr. Reich is supporting Obama and to read his reasons why. When this race started (how many eons ago?)I didn't know who I would vote for in the Democratic race and I was certainly open to Hillary. It is so very sad to see how she has campaigned. In fact, I think she is mentally ill and I hope she gets some help when this is all over. She and Bill are pathological liars and there's no way to parse that. It just "is". If Obama does not win I will leave America. I've been thinking for some time that I cannot live in this Empire any longer. If Obama does win (and I pray he does), I'll stay, observe, and act for change. For her to throw "Farakahn" in that miserable tv circus was unforgivable. But Obama dusted himself off and the numbers are still his. Thank you again Mr. Reich.
I agree with the several comments that have called you out on your lack of defending the racist labels the pundits have used on the Clintons and their supporters... You of all people know these are not racist people. It calls in to question for me the full reason for your endorsement. There is something very sadly unspoken here in the context of your integrity and sincerity.
The poster is correct. The Clintons are not racist. This is precisely what makes their repeated use of the race card even more dispicable.
Thanks, Robert, from Europe!
Have a look to those political donations by Wall Street, they tell a lot:
http://www.portfolio.com/graphics/2008/04/Wall-Street-Divided-Loyalties
Go Obama!
asuk
Dr Reich,
Thank you for stepping forward and supporting Senator Obama.
Best to you.
p.s. That sketch you did with Conan was hilarious. You're a great sport and you really come across as a good hearted guy.
Thank you Robert Reich!! I am glad that you have given your support to Barack Obama in such an all-encompassing statement. I am hopeful that the "old politics" can be pushed aside soon and we can really discuss issues that are vital to our country. I hope that you will give ongoing suggestions to the Obama campaign as it prepares to confront the Republicans and in the Obama administration as well. Your dedication to the good in America is appreciated!
Mr Reich,
I salute your courage and integrity by endorsing Mr Obama.
I believe no one without his world view, life experience, integrity, courage, philosophy, optimism, temperament, and pragmatism can lead us out of this morass.
I salute you for not kow-towing to the expected fielty by the Clintons. I hope you would not suffer the same attack from rabid Clintonistas like Carville on Bill Richardson.
Thank you for doing the RIGHT thing.
Hillary is scheduled to make an appearance in about 45 minutes here in PA. From the standpoint of a casual observer, the absence of genuine enthusiasm or "buzz" is palpable.
http://www.dropouthillary.org/
It's time for the grownups to stand up and take over. Thank you for supporting Barack Obama.
Dr Reich, after seeing you as a commentator here and there over the past few months, I thought you were ALREADY in the tank for Obama! Your "official" endorsement smacks of an egotistical "in your face" kind of slap at the Clintons. Given the respect you've enjoyed, and your stature in your field, I think it's a pretty cheap shot...
I whole-heartedly disagree with your analysis of the two candidates' positions on the issues. I think that Sen. Clinton is one of the most outstanding presidential candidates to come along in our lifetime. Her thoughtful plans for all of the important issues facing our country today are far superior to Sen. Obama's. Many of his positions were crafted by, frankly, using her ideas and then coming forward with his plan a few days later. That's why his are so similar! Moreover, Sen. Clinton will geninely work her heart out to get done what she promises. I really doubt that Obama has the experience, contacts or know-how to deliver. If he is the nominee and wins the Presidency, I believe he will limp through 4 years with nothing accomplished, and be defeated after his first term. Is that your hope for America?
Many of us have serious concerns about Obama's judgement and patriotism, given some his past political cronies. And, it has nothing to do with whether or not he wears a flag pin. Are you aware, for example, that he and Wm. Ayers funneled funds to the PLO through Professor Rashid Khalidi, a known terrorist sympathizer? Is this the sort of person we want representing the USA? (http://www.commonvoice.com/article.asp?colid=8310)
Sen. Clinton has been been very unfairly vilified by the media, her opponents, Obama supporters, misogynistic men and some truly hateful women. And yet, here she stands, on the eve of the PA primary, poised to win, and just a few percentage points behind Obama in the popular vote. This just goes to show how strong she is, and how much support she has.
If you think your endorsement of Obama will somehow erase that support, or sway undecided voters, you are seriously out of touch.
And, please don't worry about some sort of backlash from Clinton supporters. Your endorsement is just not that big of a deal... sorry!
Particularly after his poor performance in the recent debate and the whining about the questions afterward, I'm convinced that Obama is not ready for prime time. It wasn't ABC's fault that he performed poorly. Delivering well-written "West Wing" dialogue is for TV shows, not debates. I can only assume that Hillary Clinton has failed to court favor effectively, considering that all of her so-called friends are deserting her but we don't need a "likable" president - I want capable. I want determined, experienced, confident, and tough as nails.
People voted for W because he was likable and look where we are now. Americans seem destined to repeat the same bad judgments and mistakes over and over again.
Another concern is what we don't yet know about Obama. Everyone has their baggage and, as Clinton says, hers has been thoroughly searched. Her detractors are big on mentioning the investigations but the truth is - nothing was ever found after wasting $70 million. What is yet to be discovered about Obama? Democrats constantly undermine any opportunity at success and this election seems to be well on its way to disaster.
On a personal level, the Clintons must be very disappointed that decades of public service, peace, and prosperity don't mean much to an ungrateful public or even their personal "friends."
I hate to see 4 more years of (Mc)Bush and the damage that will do to our country but that's where I fear we are headed.
Bob,
I had you for two classes at the Kennedy School in 1985-1986, among the best ever for me. Congrats on your successes, including this thoughtful endorsement. --Casey
Aleki,
Obama's pastor was a Marine and signed up for a second tour in the Navy during Vietnam. How about you?
Radical is in the eyes of the beholder, and is a stupid slur.
_______
In 1961, a young African-American man, after hearing President John F. Kennedy's challenge to, "Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country," gave up his student deferment, left college in Virginia and voluntarily joined the Marines.
In 1963, this man, having completed his two years of service in the Marines, volunteered again to become a Navy corpsman. (They provide medical assistance to the Marines as well as to Navy personnel.)
The man did so well in corpsman school that he was the valedictorian and became a cardiopulmonary technician. Not surprisingly, he was assigned to the Navy's premier medical facility, Bethesda Naval Hospital , as a member of the Commander In Chief's medical team, and helped care for President Lyndon B. Johnson after his 1966 surgery. For his service on the team, which he left in 1967, the White House awarded him three letters of commendation.
What is even more remarkable is that this man entered the Marines and Navy not many years after the two branches began to become integrated.
While this young man was serving six years on active duty, Vice President Dick Cheney, was born the same year as the Marine/sailor, received five deferments, four for being an undergraduate and graduate student and one for being a prospective father. Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, both five years younger than the African-American youth, used their student deferments to stay in college until 1968. Both then avoided going on active duty through family connections.
Who is the real patriot? The young man who interrupted his studies to serve his country for six years or our three political leaders who beat the system? Are the patriots the people who actually sacrifice something or those who merely talk about their love of the country?
After leaving the service of his country, the young African-American finished his final year of college, entered the seminary, was ordained as a minister, and eventually became pastor of a large church in one of Americas biggest cities.
This man is Rev. Jeremiah Wright, the retired pastor of Trinity United Church of Christ.
Support Obama if you like words and charisma instead of substance. This life long Democrat can distinguish between a media creation and a real leader. I can't support him and I am not alone. A MacCain Thank You card must be in the mail.
THANK YOU MR. REICH.
CLARIFICATION HELPS.
CAW
To Art Layman,
Art,as usual, you do an excellent, elucidative job in analyzing the social-psychological factors driving the conflicts in our social-political model. But Im going to start calling you the "Great Hedger" ...
who carefully debunks ideas and people and then speaks positively or praises them. A very safe approach ... but hardly connecting to something you wisely said earlier that Big Steps are sometimes necessary to solve Big problems. Obama's Presidential candidacy is precisely an example of such a Big Step that takes some calculated daring.
So, I've already prepared and welcome that you're going to give me a very challenging headache when I finally come forward with my PART III-Transition to a Stable Economy... a solution framework to our current social-economic mess, which I'm still trying to find time for putting down on paper in my own, hopefully, simple way.
I wonder if you honestly think Hillary will build bridges across the huge divides in American today better than Barack ... on basis of her so-called added experience as Bill's moral confessional soulmate combined with her demonstrated talents for dividing people?
One has to dare to take some risks in this life. We took a big one with BUSH Jr. If we think the system needs fundamental reforms, we'll take an even Bigger risk of stalemate with the not so amiable, easy to work with Hillary... whose professed loyalties to Main Street are somewhat compromised by her being financed to a large extent by Wallstreet.
Obama's legitimate qualities to meet the daunting tasks ahead is not romantic thinking ... neither is the reality of the Clintons migration to the upper class money networks ($109 millon in earnings the last 8 years, $500 million for Bill´s `Good Deeds´ Trust Fund, $170 million for Bill´s library) while preening themselves about their allegiances to the less advantaged in our society. This hypocrisy is illustrated amply by those ignored, displaced workers in Pa. who -- contrary to the fatuous nonsense of Paul Krugman's recent article entitled, "Clinging to a Stereotype" -- are no further ahead after 3 Republican and 1 Democratic (Clinton) administrations. No progress! This is Obama's honesty of calling an Ace an Ace. He's really not into the blame game but wants to evolve balanced solutions that do not bring our nation further into financial chaos. He gets sidetracked with the Media's obsession with the trivial and the Clintons' recourse to the old contrived, dirty political detours that have got us to our widening social stratification and financial mess today.
We´ve become so cynical we have trouble recognizing the deep system flaws and who can best lead the way to correct them in these difficult times. We all want someone who can bring together constructive, integrated solutions for repairing a ship about to capsize ... someone who shows the best potential of quelling our cynicism and prejudices, of binding us sufficiently to sail through all the stupid ideological dogma that has kept us on a long course to Nowhere -- concerning particularly our social-educational fabric.
It's character that decides real strength, not the pretense of being tough with words. Pres. Bush Jr. has been the latest unpleasant reality lesson on this.
Here´s another quote from my favorite President, Harry Truman, that I feel has a more direct correlation to Barack´s native leadership skills (to achieve real change he's already remarkably awakened the need for) than to Hillary´s leadership skills, as intelligent as she is,:
"A successful leader cannot afford to lose the common touch ... He's using his head if he talks to everyone in sight and listens to everyone and listens hard ...
You'll find that the willingness to talk to people is true of all of the great men in our history."
I'm going "to throw the dice", another of Bill Clinton's coy fatuities about Barack, in confidence that Barack knows how he must listen to Mainstream America and the rest of the world ... to bring our economy and world respect back to normality... to steer clear of "a serious collapse waiting to happen."
Frank Thomas, The Netherlands
There has been a lot of talk about Senator Obama "losing" the pa. debate . It appeared to me that his dignity, quality and class prevented him from lowering himself to vetting Sen clinton or multiple fronts. The Obamas bring back the class of Jfk and Jackie to a country that has suffered thru the poorest and based prendency in modern times or more with Bush and the Obamas will bring dignity , Inteeligence and most important , thought thru actions and renew the world respect for our country.
Dear Dr. Reich,
Thank you for taking this courageous stand on principle and hope by endorsing Barack Obama for president. I admire your courage to step out there and lead the way by doing the right thing -- even when it is hard to do.
Well done!
-M
Robert said.....
"He has put forward the more enlightened foreign policy and the more thoughtful plan for controlling global warming".
Amen. Well said.
A month ago I didn't think Obama had a snowball's chance in hell to win the the general election. I think he's got a fighting chance now but still faces very stiff headwinds. Namely: racism/xenophobia. Never underestimate the fear and distrust the majority of Americans feel toward those outside their circle. Very prevalent among the less sophisticated.
Billary was always unelectable so we can forget about her.
It's interesting that things are seemingly so ripe for a dem to be our next president but by some twist of fate they're going to nominate a candidate who's going to have a very difficult time against McCain or one who would have absolutely no chance. Go figure; unpopular war, an economy worsening by the day and a very unpopular George Bush would seemingly give them a huge advantage.
Obama is an interesting politician and clearly the most creative of those still standing. This should help him survive what's left of Billary and can help him overcome the racism assault later in the year.
I am very disappointed that you support Obama. I knew Obama was deceptive but I was really disappointed in him for publishing a pamphlet in Iowa against John Edwards. The more I research Obama, the more concerns I have. I have always been a Democrat. And now my party (actually Obama) has done the unspeakable...disenfranchised two states. The may be the first year in my life that I vote republican! I am not alone...so you nominate Obama and Obama will self-destruct under the Republican scrutiny and by all the voters you have disenfranchised from the Democratic Party!
Robert Reich, you should be ashamed of
yourself. After all Pres. Clinton has done for you, you stab him in the back by not supporting his wife, Hillary. What's wrong with you? Are you afraid of a strong, smart woman? You know damn well she is much more qualified to lead this country than Obama, who has no experience. You are nothing but a big (excuse me, little, phony
runt). Go to hell, you two-faced bastard!
Better yet, drop dead.
I listened to Mr. Reich's comment yesterday on KCBS radio and read it just now in here. I think they are well said and well written. As an immigrant, that's my first time to listen to his voice and that voice hits the point. It is like something from a genuine American heart. We all have got fed up by mudslinging, like he said, and we got to see the CHANGE.
This post has been removed by the author.
From one Raleigh North Carolina's News and Observer, one editorial states George W Bush has given awesome power to the two current Democrats running for the nomination, a black man and a woman. Check out Barry Saunders's column
Robert,
Thank you for your very well-stated endorsement. It's consistent with your outstanding ability to articulate your arguments.
As a parent of a Cal graduate, two years ago I had the privilege to hear your commencement remarks at the outdoor Greek theatre, for the political science graduates. I thoroughly enjoyed your diplomatically worded, but heartfelt remarks then, as I do now in the text of your endorsement. I also agree wholeheartedly with them.
Thank you for taking your stand for Obama - many great comments from others with support. Some were unfortunately not American because you have a right to vote for who you want without branded as a trader. What's wrong with this country? Everyone has a vote and should use it for the person of their choice.
Mr. Reich,
I was so happy and excited to read about your endorsement of Barack Obama. I have followed your career since the Clinton administration, and I greatly respect your intellect and opinions. Like you, I believe that Senator Obama has much to offer this nation. His intelligence, judgment, and optimism will change America for the better. Thanks for your service to America, and I look forward to future blog posts.
JUDAS II.
I used to have a great deal of repect for you.
I just wandered what you got in excahnge, what kind of deal you got, or is it just that you are so narcisist that you seek th espot light that you have lost.
In either case go to hell traitor!!!
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/20/us/politics/20loyalty.html?ei=5065&en=bdeed0067115920a&ex=1209268800&partner=MYWAY&pagewanted=print
Mr. Reich:
I was unhappily surprised by your decision. At this point in time, when serious questions about Mr Obama have been raised, with his popularity in decline, one would expect that a thoughtful person like you would think carefully about his decision. It sounds very suspicious. Is the Obama camp going around looking for new friends to get him out of his abyss? In the end Repulicans are the beneficiaries of actions like yours because it shows the magnitude of betrayal and disloyalty among democrats. YOU MADE THE WRONG DECISION SIR.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/20/us/politics/20loyalty.html?ei=5065&en=bdeed0067115920a&ex=1209268800&partner=MYWAY&pagewanted=print
Hey, comrades, you can agree or disagree with Dr. Reich's decision (which I must admit I expected), but calling him names and telling him to "go to hell" is really bad form.
I'm resigned to having to vote for either Obama or Clinton, and frankly see little difference between the two and expect neither of them to do anything but continue catering to Wall Street, diverting us occasionally by tightening the embargo against Cuba (if there's still anything we can do to that country), and reminding us to wear our seat belts.
Now I might have something more emphatic to say if Dr. Reich had endorsed McCain.
I have always respected your intellect and apparent thoughtful analysis of the issues-whatever they are. I must say, however, that your endorsement of Obama is very disappointing...not because you are supporting Obama, but because of the way you chose to do it. Given your long history with the Clintons, your position in the Clinton Adminstration (in which you made quite an impact)and basic human decency...you should have kept your "endorsement" to yourself.
I fully support Hillary Clinton-not because she is married to one of the greatest US Presidents of our times, but because she's a smart, experienced, caring individual who will bring America back.
It will be a sad day for America when McCain wins-because my fellow Democrats were so misguided.
(I will be happy to vote for Obama...in 8 years-not now..there's just too much going on!)
Dr. Reich,
I really thought you were a lot smarter than this. I must admit that through the years I've enjoyed your commentary on TV, but this time, WHAT WERE YOU THINKING?
You now place yourself amongst the ranks of the media (who for the most part can hardly be considered journalists by even the loosest definition; most are nothing more than entertainers these days).
Just wait for the Republicans to take this Obama guy apart on the character issues he was so infuriated by in the last debate. And then, if they don't fully succeed, just watch him change the culture of Washington.
He'll never do it, and the way he has run his campaign against Sen. Clinton proves it. He's raised tons of MONEY with his rhetorical skills and has used it to level plenty of bogus and unfair assaults against her.
Needless to say, my opinion of you has dropped more than a few pegs.
I've admired you for a long time, very dissapointed that you are backing Barack.
KB
Dr. Reich,
Thank you for endorsing Barack Obama.
There are those that have left comments here that disagree with your decision...they are backing Hillary and so are loyal to her.
They have many misconceptions that are wrong, but if you told them they would not believe you because they do not wish to. Reading some of the comments I was very amused by some of the so called truths of Obama. That he is a terrorist in cahoots with Ayers sending money to a terrorist group? Good grief! But no one can prove they are wrong, even with the facts that have come out. It seems that even common sence has left the building; hate and distrust has become a staple in this country. Seems so many have picked up the Elitist word...Hillary started that, and so we have "arrogant" add "cocky", what they mean is "uppity."
Poor Rev. Wright, all those years of sermons and they are cooked down to 30 seconds. No one really wants to know the truth, lies are so much more fun. If they cared about truth the people making such stupid remarks about him would already have dug out YouTube or the transcripts of the sermons, asnd the remarks would not be littering up cyberworld. But lies are so much better and takes less energy.
I know that as far as you oweing the Clintons anything, you do not. If you did not have the abilities that you do, they would not have added you to the cabinet. You and the other advisors aided them with the prosperity that all lived under. You are certainly not a Judas, and the person who said so is a fool.
Thank you sir for endorsing someone I truly believe will lead this country with honor and with strength. I am truly excited about an election for the first time in years...I have been voteing for 40 years and this election has meant the most.
Thank you...from a 60 year old White woman in the south...
Supporting or not supporting a candidate is a right we have as Americans. But when one who is a public figure endorses one candidate over another publicly the inpact can be devestating. Your public announcement that you support Obama was a public rebuke of Hillary, yet one more fair weather friend throwing her under the bus lest you be left behind the band wagon.
Last week's debate is an example of why Obama cannot win. "Hope" and "change" are not policies Mr. Reich, they are pandering mantras. You and Governor Richards have shown the fabric of your character, or perhaps lack thereof. Anyone who was an adult in the 1990s knows you both owe your careers to Bill Clinton who publicly supported and encouraged you both.
drama queen.
lol.
this post is so totally toasted. it's obvious you were rooting for obama all along, and found the perfect opporunity to give this guy some 'credibility' back when he need[ed/s] it most. though, your opinion doesn't count for much in my world.
Dr. Reich,
I've been a fan of your principled centered approach and commentary (on radio) for a while now.
After the "elitist" comment made by Senator Clinton, I made the decision to support Senator Obama.
Thanks for staying true to your principles.
Thank you, Dr.Reich for supporting OBAMA at this crucial time.
I admire your courage and patriotism. To strengthen our country you , like Governor Richardson and many likes,made a tough choice overlooking Hillary Clinton. The majority in the country-grassroots emphatically support Barak Obama.
By your support we all have are convinced that our Economy will be better under him. You are a person who raptures our attention on TV and news-articles about our economy.
Thank you for speaking the truth!
Professor Reich,
You are a thoughtful intellectual who knows the value of public discourse and civic involvement. Your "Supercapitalism" was brilliant.
www.shaunking.com
Dr Reich is writing this blog in part because President Clinton gave him the opportunity to be in the national spotlight rather than remain an academic writer preaching solely to the converted.
I enjoy most all of Dr Reich's opinion pieces ("Supercapitalism" is indeed brilliant) but I cannot agree with his endorsement in spite of his long support and apparent friendships with both Senator and President Clinton. In this age of 24/7 news and vapid headlines, loyalty is no longer valued.
Senator Clinton deserves this nomination, and make no mistake, Senator Obama is winning because he is not female: even liberals are seemingly more comfortable voting for a man. This is evident by Obama supporters' belief in his superior policy positions which are virtually identical to Clinton.
We're becoming a color blind electorate but we have a long way to go towards becoming gender blind voters.
Washington is full of managers (including Ms. Clinton) as it the U.S and most of the world for that matter, acting as leaders. What we don't have is many true leaders. Mr. Obama is one such who is a true leader. And after the buffoonery of the last 8 years, we really need a leader.
Obama for president.
I am amused by those who are dissapointed by Reich's support for Obama despite all that Bill Clinton has done for him and his career. Where is the unquestioning loyalty that Hillary, via her husband, deserves?
Hillary Clinton = politics as usual
frank thomas:
One would presume you are a Democrat from most of your postings. That you voted for Reagan creates concern, but other than that your ideas seem to lean more toward the liberal persuasion. Your latest proclamation raises doubt, once again. It has always been the failing of the conservative mind to see things as nothing but black and white; right and wrong; either, or. No room for shades of grey. No thought of mitigating circumstances. That conservatives have welded that into the American psyche is as awesome as it is abhorrent. You find an incongruity in my expositions. You see my willingness to observe and appreciate the various sides to an issue or an individual as a “hedge”; perhaps, even as a failing to understand and take a position. I see it as a realistic view that recognizes perfection as an allusive quality, never truly attained, but constantly sought. To analyze and pursue perfection we must view all arguments, pro and con, for their merit, accepting some, rejecting others, and in the sense of the only real democratic solution, come to a compromise. In our uniquely American form of democracy we do not have the ability to call for new elections and disband the current government if a resolution to a particular problem is not taking the form of what is best for the public’s interests.
The hard philosophical, political lines that have evolved in the liberal vs. conservative camps often lead to resolutions which are “settling”. Solutions that are far from perfect but rather are expedient; Dr. Reich alludes to this fact in his post. The difference in these political views was what Kristof was referring to in his article and I’m not sure you totally grasp the issue. They are hard wired in the opposing camps and there is little wiggle room for meaningful resolve. Few, especially in the conservative group, are willing to consider reasoned debate as anything more than political posturing.
I respect Dr. Reich, as I do most all men. I do not revere him, as I do not any other man. Dr. Reich is a bright, competent, well educated fellow. Much of what he asserts I find right on. Some of his expositions and decisions I do not agree with and I reserve the right to do that. This does not make me a “hedger”. Rather, it makes me an honest observer of the wisdom and ignorance of all men; albeit as defined by me.
Those who feel a sense of duty to fall in line with all that their heroes posit or who, through fealty, feel a servile need to accept those hero’s judgments, do not express an independent mind. I am a realist. Generally a pragmatic one but sometimes tinged with cynicism. For instance; you propose that investment banks, hedge funds, whatever, should be required to maintain sufficient capital for all their financial finagling. One could hardly argue with the soundness of that proposal, except that it will be argued that it seriously impairs the use of financial leverage as a viable profit making tool.
Good risk management, another of your epiphanies, is hardly arguable. I would bet that at the outset of the securitization of mortgage products, risk was considered minimal. Even if a concern, the egos and intellect of the Wall Street wizards would have presumed they could get out before catastrophe occurred. Our quest for more money/profits has segued from establishing firms to make things for a profit, to bypassing the logistical and monetary risks of labor and capital paradigms and conjuring up ways to make more with pieces of paper. Be that paper, currency or stocks/bonds or securitized debt obligations, it represents a greater liquidity, or so they thought, than millions in plant and equipment and labor. One of the largest investment banks employed good risk management with the subprime mess: They marketed the products to their customers while selling the same vehicles short. Surely a wise risk management strategy but leaves the issue of ethics a conundrum.
Since you read the NYT, if you haven’t read Sunday’s article, CHAPTER ONE; Worked Over and Overworked, please read it. It is a glaring example of where this nation has been going for the past few decades, if not from our inception. Alexis de Tocqueville recognized that money making was our dominant ethic. It is this ethic, rather than the lack of sound banking regulation and practices that is the crux of many of our current dilemmas.
These are but a few facts and observations of our culture and where we have transitioned. Changing culture is not like changing the minimum wage or flipping on the light switch. It is a generational progression, requiring a constancy of principles and mores. It might begin with allusions to hope and change but those allusions are vacuous if a significant alteration of our focus is not forthcoming. Obama does speak in eloquent, awe inspiring tomes. What he, and you, fails to rea